
Ridden and Reviewed
Evil Wreckoning LS
Evil released the Wreckoning 3 in 2020 as a 2021 model year bike. It didn't take long for Evil to launch this Wreckoning LS version (LS stands for Lightly Salted). The LS version uses the same frame, so geometry is unchanged, but adds a couple useful updates; captured shims in the linkage that don't fall out when you pull the shock, a Universal Derailleur Hangar and an updated frame colour.
Evil Wreckoning LS Summary
- 166 mm rear travel with 170 mm travel fork
- 29 inch wheels
- 64.6° / 63.9° head angle in the Low / X-Low Settings
- 430 mm chainstays on all sizes
- Reach is 475 / 468 mm in a size large in the Low / X-Low Settings

I love this colour of the Wreckoning, and I think the whole bike looks fantastic.
Fit and Geometry
I giddily unboxed the XL sized Evil Wreckoning LS. That first peak of the frame through the packaging, and I instantly loved the matte terracotta colour called Clay Porter, a classy nod to one of my favourite filmmakers. I got the tires pumped up and suspension set up to my liking and wheeled the bike outside. I excitedly mounted the bike, and then quickly realized I couldn't reach the pedals, F! Even with the seat post as low as it'd go I was short by a good 3 inches. WTF Evil, who'd make this bike for? String bean aliens? I don't have the longest legs around, but I didn't think my 32 inch inseam was that insufficient. The problem here is the exceptionally tall seat tube, with a rather long 213 Revive seat post that couldn't be fully inserted. Soaked with inadequacy, I asked Evil for a shorter seat post, which they thankfully sent in a jiffy. With this shorter drop seat post my feet could now reach the pedals, and that's handy! It's at about this time that I figured I should check out the geometry chart on their website. The Evil Wreckoning is, errr, compact. So compact in fact, it's the shortest wheelbase and steepest head angle bike I've ridden since the 130 mm travel Druid back in 2019. Here's a comparative geometry chart of similar, size Large, bikes inspired by Mike's Jekyll article:

*the effective Seat Tube Angle is more like 68 degrees.
"Houston! We've got a problem ..."
See, I've been banging on about trail bikes needing to be longer and slacker since the beginning of time, and now I have this beautiful thing in my garage that is the complete antithesis of that diatribe. In a nutshell the Evil Wreckoning LS has the shortest wheelbase, shortest rear center, steepest head angle, and longest / slackest seat tube amongst its peers. Party on! Let's go do some skids!

The Wreckoning's Delta Link suspension system has many bolts. And there is a handy sag-o-meter built into the shock rocker pivot on the non-drive side.
Frame Layout
The Evil Wreckoning is a linkage-driven, single pivot bike. The main pivot is relatively low in the chassis, so we can expect the Wreckoning to be fairly efficient pedaling, but with the compromise of some braking force influence on suspension, and being a bit harsher through rough sections of trail. The shock is driven by a linkage, resulting in a nicely progressive ramp up through the stroke.
The front triangle feels reasonably stiff, with quite a bit of compliance built into the rear triangle. The bike weighs in at 34 lbs with pedals, and the heavy DH casing Specialized Hillbilly up front. With the stock EXO casing front tire, it'd be 33 lbs, which is quite light considering I'm testing the cheapest build, with a coil shock.

Metric and Freedom Units on the same screw? Pick a side Evil!

Pivot bolt torque in freedom units, the rear axle in metric torques. Maybe I'm being a pedantic dick here, but changing units on my torque wrench is a pain.
The Wreckoning comes with a Low and X-Low mode. I like bikes with adjustable geometry, you get two bikes in one. Flipping the flip-chips on the Wreckoning isn't trivial however. You have to remove the shock, and 19 other parts to flip. The X-Low mode slackens the head angle by 0.6°, slackens the seat tube by 0.5° and drops the bottom bracket by 9 mm.

This is the pile of parts you need to remove to flip the flip chip. This is alot, I don't recommend doing this on the trail.
Parts Check
Boingy Bits - The Zeb and Super Deluxe Coil were fantastic. Both were easy to get dialed in and are top performers on the trail.
Spinny Bits - I love the buzz of the I9 Hydra, and while I've had issues with I9 hubs on my personal bikes, I had no issues with the wheels during this test.
Grippy Bits - EXO casing tires shouldn't be on a 170 mm travel bike, and a MaxxTerra compound shouldn't be on the front tire.
Stoppy Bits - The G2 brakes were ok, but I think a Code brake is more appropriate on a bike of this travel.
Going Bits - The GX drivetrain was flawless through the test.
Sitting Bits - Volt Saddle and Revive post were awesome.
Hanging On Bits - While I didn't love the shape of the house brand bar, I didn't hate it either. The house brand stem, and grips worked just fine.

Smooth lines with clean industrial design throughout the Evil Wreckoning.
Pricing
This Wreckoning LS as tested is the cheapest GX I9 Hydra build, which will set you back $8,676 CDN or $6,450 USD. The top spec build tops out at a price of $9,299 USD. A frame set is also available for $3,750 USD. While this certainly isn't cheap I think the price is in line with comparable build and travel bikes on the market.

It was the first major snow of the year here on our scheduled shoot day, hence the moody snowy action shots. Thankfully we've had plenty of good dirt this winter as well to formulate some more thorough impressions of the Wreckoning LS.
Ride Impressions
I pull the Wreckoning off the bike rack, start my ride. First impressions climbing the Wreckoning LS are that it pedals firmly. The pedal mode on the Rock Shox Super Deluxe coil is aggressive, and when combined with the decent anti-squat built into the Wreckoning's architecture, results in a firm efficient platform for climbing. The light EXO casing tires in the harder Maxxterra compound further helped to make the Wreckoning feel effortless to pedal. I then wheelied clean off the trail. The short rear center and slack seat stube puts my fat ass over the rear axle. This means that on anything remotely steep I have to move so far forward, I'm grinding my grundle into the tippy top of the nose of the saddle to stay upright. On anything steep and technical the front end of the Wreckoning is light and wandery, which makes getting around switchbacks and up steep bits very difficult. To avoid flatting the paper thin EXO casing tires I have to run high tire pressures, which when combined with the hard MaxxTerra compound results in the Wreckoning LS spinning out the wet roots / rocks on the climbing trails. In the X-Low setting, technical climbing is honestly abysmal, setting the record for most walked test bike I've ever reviewed.

Out for a casual climb on the Wreckoning.
Once you're done wheelying and walking up the climb, it's time for the fun bit, going down. This initially proved scary. The EXO casing, MaxxTerrafying tires are woefully inadequate around here in the winter, and maybe it's because I didn't have the balls to go any faster than walking pace, but the G2 brakes felt a bit anemic too. With the cold and damp conditions I decided the front tire was preventing me from properly testing the bike, so I switched it out for a Specialized HillBilly. This made a large improvement.

This looks laughably easy. It isn't. Especially when there was unknown amounts of untracked snow in the line.
With the front tire sorted, descending is where the Wreckoning put a smile on my face. I thoroughly enjoyed riding the Wreckoning; it's nicely balanced from front to rear, and proved easy to ride. The compact geometry means it's eager and agile to turn. I loved how urgently the Wreckoning changes directions. On tighter, more awkward trails the Wreckoning is a joy to ride. The short rear center means the front end comes up with ease, allowing the rider to squeeze sneaky manuals into almost every section of trail. Popping lips with such a short wheelbase is easy and satisfying. The Wreckoning seemed to relish being flung from feature to feature down the trail.

Even in the snow the Wreckoning was a joy to turn.
With the Wreckoning LS having more anti-squat, due to the lower main pivot, it feels like Evil went for a relatively light tune in the Super Deluxe coil. I could run the shock with less low speed compression damping and still get firm acceleration out of the Wreckoning. This feels fantastic on smoother trails when the brakes are off. On steeper, rougher trails however the short comings of the lower single pivot start to show. There is some brake squat, and the Wreckoning isn't the most compliant with larger square-edged bumps.

You'll be wheelying and jibbing around just about everywhere on the Wreckoning.
While the compact geometry on the Wreckoning LS might not be my particular cup of tea, I found I was able to ride this bike very quickly through tight, awkward sections of trail. The Wreckoning LS is the type of bike that makes time in the slow sections, and then takes a skilled rider to hang on in fast, scary sections where is there is less time to gain. In the right hands, the Wreckoning LS is a fast little bike. Another major upside to the compact, agile nature of the Wreckoning LS is that it makes easy, benign trails a blast to ride. Jibbing around on trails, and pulling for weird gaps was effortless and rewarding.

Snowy side hit, yes please!
Conclusions
CONS: The Evil Wreckoning LS is a deeply flawed bike. The seat post length is too long, and the seat post angle is way too slack, making it very difficult to climb up anything technical. The geometry as a whole feels outdated. The build on this bike (outside of the coil shock and Zeb fork) feels like it'd be more appropriate on a 120 mm travel bike, which is actually the exact same build Evil offers on their 120 mm travel Following and 140 mm travel Offering. The Wreckoning LS sort of feels like long travel bits were put on a short travel bike, but one that isn't very good at climbing. The hundreds of bolts in the suspension will come loose, and the flip chip requires a comical number of parts to be removed to flip.

The Wreckoning LS is a bike that squeezes fun out of even the most plain trails.
PROS: If you've made it this far you'd probably think I absolutely hate this bike. But sitting here now, writing this review, reflecting on my time on the Wreckoning LS, I really enjoyed this bike. I found the drunken climbing characteristics a challenge that were equal parts frustrating and satisfying. Riding the Wreckoning LS down trails I know well felt sped up, making them more exciting. Sections that are normally blasé on the Endurbro ballistic missiles in the stable made me fizz on the Wreckoning LS. With so many super-aggressive enduro bikes on the market, I like that Evil has made something different, something fun and playful, but still with a bunch of travel to go smash around on. Not everyone has the trails or ability to stretch the capabilities of the super long, low, slack bikes that are the norm now. If you're one of the folks that feel enduro has ruined trail bikes by forcing bike manufacturers to make any bike over 150 mm travel their "enduro race weapon", this is a bike for you. If you can live with the challenging climbing characteristics of the Wreckoning LS, and are looking to squeeze more fun out of your local trails, I think the Wreckoning LS is fun bike worth checking out.

Age: 42
Height: 183 cm / 6'
Weight: 83 kg / 182 lbs
Ape Index: 1.055 / +10 cm
Inseam: 81 cm / 32"
Preferred Riding: Gravity Mountain Bike
Bar Width: 800 mm
Preferred Reach: 500 - 520 mm (but this is stack and head angle dependent)
Comments
Vik Banerjee
2 years, 2 months ago
Perspective is everything. I'd be happy with that geo in a large. The reasonable STA and the long, but not excessive 430mm CS would be great. And since a ~175-180mm dropper is as long as I want to go the seat tube length would be fine. I did demo an earlier version of the Wreckoning and it was pretty nice.
It's good to see a company make a bike I want to ride these days.
Reply
Lu Kz
2 years, 2 months ago
I've personally gone back from the "long low steep and slack" thing to "slack but not terribly long low or steep" thing.
There's still a SMALL handful of mainstream companies that are offering somewhat moderate but effective geometry in the enduro life that aren't out to lunch with "out of date" bikes. If you put a gun to my head and said I had to get a 2023+ bike (in this category) from a mainstream company I'd have to go with the new Devinci Spartain, given the current Slayer and Enduro are probably not long for this world (and if I were a betting man, those two are probably going longer, lower, and steeper).
Edit: Funny you consider 430 CS long but not excessive - IMO it's downright short on a modern long travel bike! Gone are the days of the 415mm CS Kona Operators!
Reply
Cr4w
2 years, 2 months ago
I owned a first generation Wreckoning, which was very briefly a desirable bike for big guys (until we gave up trying to make sense of that seat tube angle). I loved the suspension and damn it was beautiful but the fit issues were insurmountable for me. They could easily adjust the bigger sizes to fit differently (and hey've had plenty of updates to accomplish that) but they just choose not to. I kind of respect their stubbornness but I find it incongruous with the forward thinking attitude that produced The Following and the Chamois Hagar.
Reply
Glenn Bergevin
2 years, 2 months ago
I've got a Chamois Hagar and am an evil og... I was a hucker kid on a 26/24 mullet Imperial with Gazzaloddis back in the day... But evils current line up confuses me.
The CH is, 3 years later, still the most progressive gravel bike out there and it's an absolute beast. Everything else seems like it's set up for a weekender that wants a cringey take on a more hardcore image, and will pay to play. I'm getting skeeved out just thinking about it.
Reply
smoothjazzlines
2 years, 2 months ago
I was on the other end of many of your emails to EVIL HQ... I too wished for a longer bike.
Reply
Cr4w
2 years, 2 months ago
My takeaway was that they like doing things exactly the way they are and that XXL people aren't really on their radar, that the XL bikes are really just a bigger option for M-L riders, which is the only size they will ever optimize for. Good to know.
Reply
smoothjazzlines
2 years, 2 months ago
Definitely some highly skilled riders and designers there who were shorter (than us) and came up in a time of small wheels and reaches. Hard to say if it was blinders or commitment. I will say making bikes and running a company is hard.
Reply
cheapondirt
2 years, 2 months ago
You had me at "wheelying clean off the trail!" All this fun sounds worth some hiking.
Reply
Raymond Epstein
2 years, 2 months ago
I've owned both the V1 and V3 Wreckonings. They are super playful fun bikes. However, if you are taller than 5'8" (freedom measurements) or 173 cm (every other sane place on the planet's metric system) I'd recommend looking elsewhere if climbing constitutes any larger percentage of your riding. At my 'Murican 5'7" I had no problem climbing with either Wreckers and I ran both of them in X-Low all the time. Meanwhile my 6'3" pal never got used to his. Now I'm aboard a Stumpy EVO/Banshee Paradox V3 and both are much easy to ascend on.
Reply
Tim Coleman
2 years, 2 months ago
This is a great point, and one I wish I'd thought of when writing the review. Being shorter means less seat post, so the seated position isn't as far back in the bike. Shorter folks should find better climbing characteristics on the Wreckoning than taller folks.
Reply
Vik Banerjee
2 years, 2 months ago
I'm 5'11" with a 33" inseam and the Wrecker I demo'd climbed great for me given the category they belong to. There are a lot of factors that determine climbing prowess and looking at height alone is too simplistic.
Reply
Tim Coleman
2 years, 2 months ago
What size were you riding Vik, and what was the climb like where you demo'd the bike? Going up a relatively gradual climb like Fromme or Seymour the Wreckoning was fairly efficiently for it's category. But up the steeper, technical climbs in Whistler, Burke or Eagle Mountain, the Wreckoning was a handful.
Reply
Rob_Grain
2 years, 2 months ago
I like this review and love a bike that’s not lock step with the prevailing trend. In the conclusion section seat post is used to mean seat tube, common mistake, time for a wreckoning
Reply
Tim Coleman
2 years, 2 months ago
You're totally correct, that's my blunder!
Reply
DanL
2 years, 2 months ago
This feels parallel to my 2015 Process153 (not in geo or anything concrete, just when I reflected on the experience).... climbing was vague and rearward tilted but when it came time to ride down ( or along) I couldn't stop jumping, wheelying, jibbing, sidehitting and giggling
A conflicting bike but the funs beat out the lows every single time and the masochist in me started to enjoy the climbing challenge it presented
Reply
Maximum Radness
2 years, 2 months ago
I think evil has some homework to do, and it’s a big classroom. The delta link system has massive potential, and I know this is at least v.2 or v.3 since Dave ironed it out on the revolt. But it’s time for a modernized everything on their trail bikes. Linkage driven single pivots with coils can be incredible bikes……
Reply
Raymond Epstein
2 years, 2 months ago
"Linkage driven single pivots with coils can be incredible bikes……"
100%. As an previous owner of both the V1 and V3 Wreckoning I have little to nothing bad to say about them. However as previously noted, they have some quirks that don't let them work for everyone. Not that you or anyone else cares, but sometime just after Guerilla Gravity introduced their "Revved" Carbon I visited their shop and demoed (well just pedaled around the parking lot) one of the first ones in my size they'd made. I immediately thought about small US companies like Evil licensing that process as their front triangles and likely the swing arms could be made in that manner. I even asked GG about them licensing it, however they remained coy. If GG's significant higher strength claims are true this seems like a no brainer for a company that previously had many issues. Granted those have mostly dissipated, but still.
Since I'm solving all the world's problems here, I'd make the following changes to the Wreckoning LS (and the rest of their line up as applicable): A longer reach and a slightly longer size-dependent chainstay, a cup-based headset adjustment to change up the head angle (like what Specialized has for the EVO), a straight seat tube that comes directly up from the BB at an actual measurement of 76 degrees or more and lastly internal frame storage. Oh wait, one more thing...ditch the 157 spacing as it wouldn't matter in the above design and you'd have much simpler cross compatibility with the zillions of other 148 bikes.
Reply
Morgan Heater
2 years, 2 months ago
I wonder if they've ironed out their most recent layup issues. I have a buddy (who admittedly breaks everything) who rides quite hard, and watched him break a brand new replacement rear triangle on a single ride on relatively mild terrain.
Reply
kcy4130
2 years, 2 months ago
I swear this is what all evil reviews are like (either from an reviewer or a customer): Its' seated fit flaws are hard to ignore, but it's also super fun a lot of the time.
Reply
Chris
2 years, 2 months ago
Refreshingly unfiltered review but this statement doesn't add up 'With the Wreckoning LS having more anti-squat, due to the lower main pivot'. A higher pivot nets higher anti squat. A lower pivot the opposite.
Reply
Deniz Merdano
2 years, 2 months ago
I have to agree with Tim about The wrecker having quite high anti squat, but I am not sure how it's related to its pivot location. I am under the impression that the closer the pivot is to the chainline higher it can be. I don't see how higher pivots can have more AS
Reply
Flatted-again
2 years, 2 months ago
It kinda depends, right? Sure, a high pivot bike with an idler may have higher anti-squat due to the pivot , but you’ve got to take into account the rear center length, the head angle, the instant center, the gearing, the front center, etc etc. I could see how a low pivot bike with a short rear end could have higher anti squat than a high pivot bike with a long rear end. (I'm basing this off of this explanation: https://www.pinkbike.com/news/definitions-what-is-anti-squat.html, I'm no engineer)
Reply
earle.b
2 years, 2 months ago
With a single pivot swingarm (this bike and any other linkage driven single pivot) the higher the pivot the more anti-squat.
High pivot idler bikes are a different bred and follow different rules due to the idler.
Just replace "low" with "high" in the text and it's all good.
Reply
Cr4w
2 years, 2 months ago
This bike has a ton of AS and AR. My experience with a V1 Wreckoning is that these factors contribute to the bike feeling really taught, almost in self tension. You have to ride it super hard to get it to sing but sing it will (downhill for sure, uphill was just me trying not to flip over backwards the whole time).
https://linkagedesign.blogspot.com/2021/09/evil-wreckoning-v3-2021.html?m=1
Reply
Ride.DMC
2 years, 2 months ago
I must be the odd one out here. Seems like every reviewer at NSMB can't get a long with Maxterra compound in our wet Vancouver winters. I rode Maxterra DHF's all last winter and don't recall having any issues. I'm riding Schwalbe's this year with the Addix soft compound. They may be marginally grippier but I am not sure if it's a result of the rubber compound? I find the sidewalls on the Schwalbe to be much stiffer than the EXO casing on the DHF which in turn allows me to run lower pressures (18 - 20 PSI Front and 20 - 22 PSI Rear), which I attributed to be the source of the modestly improved grip. On the EXO casing tires I had to run about 2 - 3 PSI more to avoid the squirmy feeling of the tire folding over in a corner. To the author - what pressures were you running in your tires?
Having said all this I haven't ridden any Maxgrip compound tires before - so it may just be the case that I don't know what I am missing.
Reply
Perry Schebel
2 years, 2 months ago
oh man. MG vs maxterror is night & day on wet rooty / rocky terrain. i run MG front all year & swap a MT to the rear come dry season for longevity. just the rear mt in the wet is thrilling enough; would never touch a front (for local riding, anyways).
Reply
Tim Coleman
2 years, 2 months ago
For EXO casing tires I need to run about 25-26 psi front and 30 psi rear to avoid getting flats. With Schwalbe Super Gravity Casings I can get away with 22 psi front and 25 psi rear. Sure I can ride dual MaxxTerra tires down most things, but with a grippy front tire I can ride much faster, and with more control. Some of the steeper features and trails I like to ride are terrifying without a soft compound front tire. So I run a Super Soft purple Magic Mary or MaxxGrip Maxxis on the front of my bikes year round.
Reply
Hamish Simson
2 years ago
This comment has been removed.
Please log in to leave a comment.