the way you asked the question would seem to indicate that you were making a presumptuous or rhetorical statement and not genuinely asking a question seeking clarification on the idea of "people voting for BO just because he was black." the reason for this is that jbazzet's previous question for proof was based on tungsten's direct conclusion that as your question follows the same logic exhibted by tungsten it is fair to be questions on the burden of proof.
I`ll go emoticon crazy so everyone can further gauge my context. Or the clique can slow their roll and calm their hackles.
it's true that you don't owe jbazett or any other fucker a thing (proof of your claims) but if you want to be taken seriously instead of considered someone with the IQ of a coconut then substantiating your claim(s) when asked would go a long way to people considering what you have to say instead of automatically throwing it into the circular filing bin. of course, it should also go without saying that you should be using somewhat credible sources to back up your claims instead of only one or two references from "alternative" media sites of questionable nature.
the way debate works is that someone makes a statement and then someone else questions or disputes it and the original commenter defends their position with verifiable sources. this continues back and forth until hopefully the two parties can reach some sort of conclusion with the "losing" side hopefully having enough sense of self worth to step up and acknowledge that their pov may not have been correct. if anyone is not willing to do that they're not worthy of fair debate but instead worthy of being told they have the intelligence level of a coconut.
so the only question left is, who wants to be a coconut?
… just like so many of you who pick one sentence out of a whole post of mine and go on a tirade.
I`ve already stated in multiple threads that I choose the loosing side - how can one person actually win with factual sources in that case. See the irony of it all now. Keep in mind, when I say fucker or fucker plural, its an endearing term to describe the clique from the obola thread. You guys earned it then and havent let me down.
protect tom mcdonald at all costs
