KenN profile

And in my 30 years of mountain biking, I've had the opposite experience!

Okay, so first ... thank you from the bottom of my heart for correctly calling it Daylight SAVING Time, not savingS time!  It's not a fxxxing bank account!

I may be in the minority, but I actually like the DST system.  The worst thing, imo, is having to endure the endless bitching and moaning about DST twice/year.  All this silliness about "increased accidents" and so on are just a diversion that appeals to people that are so resistant to change that they can't handle an hour of time change.  People fly across time zones every single day and adjust to 1, 2, 3 and more hours of time change and nobody whinges about that!

Rant over, the sun is coming out for what's shaping up to be a gorgeous Monday, can't wait to finish off my work cause Imma hit some trails this afternoon!

That's gorgeous! I have a pic from when we rode that trail, but much later in the season so no wildflowers in bloom.

Kn.

Did he crash or was he ordered to do pushups for being a "bad boy"?

:scream:

Nice helmet.

For a real challenge, ride the line between the two wood ramps.

Kn.

> Gerbil Cage! I saw them pulling a British guy out of this stunt on a stretcher.

Not the gerbil cage. This pic is the Zipper.

Kn.

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

Posted by: chupacabra

I am starting to think that solar geoengineering might not be such a bad idea.  Even if we were carbon neutral tomorrow and changed how we grow food and replant forests, there is theoretically a 40 years lag before the climate will stabilize at that level.  Since we are not doing that we can easily add 20 years, so 60 more years of warming beyond what we see today.  That is an Earth very different than the one we live on.  The only option would be to counter it somehow.  Thoughts?

What do we do with the old panels after they've expired? Similar to electric car batteries past their shelf life - we don't have a good means to recycle them.

Why do you insist on making statements as if they are facts, when in reality they are completely untrue?

I'm somewhat on the fence. There is a genuine reason to have an air force that is reasonably well equipped. The current jet fleet is aging out, so will need to be replaced.

However, these either/or statements like "that money could be used for ..." are patently dishonest. The budget allows for money to be spent on many thousands of projects and expenditures, so the implied trade-off isn't fair.

Found a jersey on the Penny Lane climb yesterday (July 16). Msg me if you think it's yours.

I'm well and truly terrified of what my kids will have to face in their world after we've finished fucking it up.

My welcome what?

Posted by: XXX_er

Maybe more progressive than some towns, the mayor posted on FB that 69 %  under 12 has at least 1 vax

I'm gonna go ahead and assume that you meant over 12, since the vax isn't approved for under 12s yet.

Seriously ... fuck off with that stupid bullshit.

I can't find anything more recent than 2017 data ....

Posted by: tashi

Posted by: tungsten

We're fucked... 

I wonder what these graphs would look like if the CO2 from manufacturing were tallied to the consumer country instead of the producer country.

Now let's see what the graph looks like if we recalc the numbers per capita.

The language that you choose clearly indicates that you have all the answers, and aren't interested in learning anything, so why would I waste my time?

You clearly don't have the slightest clue how lithium is extracted, nor where it is extracted from. If you truly give a shit, find some better information and avoid your shitty little conspiracy sites. Try https://www.ucsusa.org/ for a start. I'm not doing any work for your intellectually lazy ass.