aShogunNamedMarcus profile

Sooo when can I get one?

If they had a Large in a 27.5 offering, I think my Operator might've ended up in the Buy & Sell pretty damn quick.

That red part in the smoke is the Tall Crane arm. Huge lickin flames.

Obession, or Addiction? That is the question that preoccupies The Master Plan Dan.

K&N?

ya K&N!

nice lookin motor but I hated that commercial ;)

Is it all its cranked up to be?

> How much you asking?

I knew I forgot something. Price has been added to the main description but also right here: $900 CDN plus shipping. I can ship this pro.

> Is that an 01? I can't remember my Monster years…

frame and monster both '00. The '01s were black and red.

> marcus look at the whistler website and gallery ur in the second to last picture of may

You had my hopes up - I was hoping it was an action shot, not a shot of my backside.

> holy fuck, so there was a CK steelset stuck in the reducers? I guess as long as the frame is OK its all good. What happened to the steelset?

The steelset is A-ok. The reducers were actually really easy to cut with a hacksaw after I went through a few dremel disc's trying to get all surgical on its ass. Nothing but one minor scratch on the one of the steelset cups.

Posted by: tashi

Things don’t need to be perceptible to humans to be real.

Lol who's crazy now yo?

Posted by: LoamtoHome

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

No one sees the problem with a kid that had 10k in two guns, rounds and optics?

This isn't a gun control thing but unless he's connected, how?

Apparently schools in the US don't lock the doors.

In other news, Hillarys campaign manager through her under the bus for the Russia collusion and there's some WHO and WEF shiz going on too.

Don't focus too much on one hand.

who let the idiot in?

So other than the usual hot topic posts that will revolve around gun control, you're not asking the obvious?

A kid gets chased by the cops, ends up in a school, goes nuts and there's an Instagram model that received messages from the shooter ?

Has he been connected to Russia yet?

Posted by: Couch_Surfer

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

No one sees the problem with a kid that had 10k in two guns, rounds and optics?

Yes.  Everyone sees this as a problem.  Everyone who's political careers aren't funded by the NRA.

That wasn't what I was getting at. Did he have a job or was he gifted two high powered assault rifles and optics?

Don't think he got then from grandma.

No one sees the problem with a kid that had 10k in two guns, rounds and optics?

This isn't a gun control thing but unless he's connected, how?

Apparently schools in the US don't lock the doors.

In other news, Hillarys campaign manager through her under the bus for the Russia collusion and there's some WHO and WEF shiz going on too.

Don't focus too much on one hand.

Posted by: switch

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

Ok so I'm not out

Posted by: switch

When you look at a ripe tomato, for instance, the redness you see is not a property of the tomato itself, but a result of light waves reflecting off the tomato into your eye.

It definitely is a property of the tomato.  The light waves are just exposing that property.

So what about color blind people or people who don't see shades properly?

And this is a bit of a departure but if there's no light in space (ie, no stars in the moon landing pics), then what exactly are looking at?

The tomato has a property that, when exposed to EMF, re-emits EMF of a certain frequency.  Does it whether such a thing as a color blind person exists or they do not.

And no need for conspiracy BS.

First for your conspiracy bs, just bc you don't have that answer doesn't mean  it's a conspiracy or me trolling you (bc I'd have to know what you don't ).

As for emf, I get that aspect (really) but it's akin to a tree falling in the forest. Or similar to how in theory we always saw in hi-def just never had the tech for it.

Posted by: Fast-Orange

Whenever a guy I know starts getting really into "logic" or "critical thinking" or "behavioral psychology" I start getting concerned. Being vocally interested in such topics makes it easy to mistake our emotional reactions to things as coming from a place of logic and reason cuz as we've seen from JP you can make pretty much any nonsense sound logical if you wrap it up in smart sounding words.

That's where shit can get dangerous.

Just as dangerous as people who gloss over things like the possible ramifications of Twitter having >50% bots on board.

How so? People who don't care to vote will vote for who they think is going to win based on basic popularity or who has the most friends bc they want to think they voted for the winner. That's not dealing with actual votes either.

Posted by: syncro

This seems like as good a place as any to leave this.

The patient was extremely fortunate not to be overcome by toxic gases or sustain injury," the department said.

But how you ask?

https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/fire-crews-rescue-washington-woman-after-she-falls-headfirst-into-toilet-1.5874205

So without reading this article does it mention why she didn't drown if she was down for 20 mins (gathered from chups  comment).

Ok so I'm not out

Posted by: switch

When you look at a ripe tomato, for instance, the redness you see is not a property of the tomato itself, but a result of light waves reflecting off the tomato into your eye.

It definitely is a property of the tomato.  The light waves are just exposing that property.

So what about color blind people or people who don't see shades properly?

And this is a bit of a departure but if there's no light in space (ie, no stars in the moon landing pics), then what exactly are looking at?

Posted by: Fast-Orange

I have good news for you. He was allowed to post it and he wasn't banned from Twitter for posting it. There was no infringement on his free speech.

Thanks tips. 

Judging by the replies to it, not just here, his comment infringed on people's views and caused them to reply saying he shouldn't have said it.

Because they didn't agree with it. Maybe I'll change my stance to people should deal with it and stfu instead? Would that help you get over my previous statements regarding infringement?

Posted by: Straw

Huh, I thought Jordan Peterson was a pretty solid guy, and I don't subscribe to any of Shoguns ideas typically. But that comment, Sorry Not Beautiful, is off-brand and just mean.  And makes him look like the tosser.

For the record, I don't agree with that comment either but I do support the notion he's entitled to it and allowed to post it.

As for curvy thick Asians, le Shogun is not opposed (if anyone actually needs to know).