Posted by: Polymath
Guns don't kill people. People kill people. Look at the UK. Guns are heavily restricted and guess what the number one weapon of choice is? Knives. Violence always finds a way. The real problem is society, not the tools it uses. Look at school shooters: all male, mostly single (if not all), high prevalence of mental issues but most importantly lack of societal integration. Timothy McVeigh didn't use a gun but a truck with diesel fuel and fertilizer. Going to ban them too? And Fast-Orange brings up good points on the issue of cars too. What do you think the ratio deaths due to driving vrs. guns are. I wonder how many cars there are relative to population. And NV wants to pack in more people to raise the tax base but have they done anything to improve the roads?
It seems that anytime the topic of gun control and gun violence comes up there's always someone who'll use the "people kill people" argument - and it's not a very strong one. Let's at least consider that killing someone with a gun is easier than killing someone with a knife, both from a physical and psychological standpoint (link). While it's important to acknowledge societal factors, we should also consider that Western societies share fairly similar laws and values when making comparisons. To your point though, the USA may be a bit of an anomaly as guns are a large part of their culture. However, is killing a large part of their culture or is the main difference that its citizens have very easy access to highly efficient killing instruments in the form of semi-automatic rifles with high capacity magazines? You brought up school shooters, which ironically kinds of scuttles the point you're trying to make. Do you think those school shootings would have resulted in as many deaths had the assailant been using a knife instead of a gun? So while people do kill people, easy access to firearms, including those with the capacity to shoot a high number of bullets in a short period of time, make it much easier to kill/injure a lot of people.
Another poor point in your post is the inference of firearm bans. The talk is not about banning firearms, the talk is about stronger firearm legislation that includes improved licensing and restrictions to certain types of firearms, magazine sizes and modifications. If there's going to be any meaningful talk on firearms then it has to be based in a fairly realistic understanding of the issue and not one that is based primarily on emotion and personal bias.