peterk profile

Products like this (and Shimano dual action shifting) are unfairly targeteted in "ReMEmbER tHEse 10 wOrST bIKe pArTS?" articles when there are real shit bike parts that still plague stock bikes to this day: stock tires that use hockey puck rubber, organic brake pads, non-tubeless rims, shit cable routing, disposable rear hubs, remote lockouts etc...

I too enjoy the articles. Imagine if bike companies read what he writes. We would have better bikes coming right out of the box!

Riding from somewhere else to the trails is also a great idea from a safety perspective. Not specific to the shore, but many places have trails that spill out or cross the access road. Less cars = less danger for our fellow riders.

Really think our distributors will pass on the savings of any potential export reimbursements?

Interesting concept and I've done it on a couple of bikes, but trying to stay on top of the standards really ruins finding hubs on sale and resale value. Thought about doing this to a fatbike, (26×4 and 29×3) but decided to build up a used 29er instead.

not to open up the can of worms, but I think Amanda was referring to the next step up: ambassadors who get bikes for free replacing racers who get bikes for free.

I think people riding 160mm bikes on Frisby Ridge could use a Man Specific Bike

And something that is not normally thought about, but climbing trails can get "blown out" too. Why not restrict these things to shuttle trails? They are built to handle the traffic, and more environmentally friendly than a bunch of bros driving up and down in one ton trucks.

just be glad you don't go through tires, rims, suspension bushings, and brake pads as often as shore riders.

I saw a food company offering up $25000 to an adventure blogger next summer. The kind of money that could fund racer(s). That might be what Mme. Batty was talking about.

crap rims and spokes on stock builds. What's the difference between a cheap set of rims and top of the line aluminum rims? $200 at most. Add $100 to the MSRP, take off that up-spec'd rear derailleur and put some proper rims with butted spokes on ALL bikes.

The excellent $2-3000 bikes aren't marketed well enough. People get it in their heads that they need XTR, XX1, S-Works, etc. No problem for people that appreciate the finer things in life and are fine with paying $10K, but now we've got people shopping online, asking for prodeals, buying chinese knock offs. Shop loses all their margin for just a marginally better bike.

Frustrating that we can intelligently debate the merits of new standards, the reputations of certain companies (cough Crank bros), but we are outnumbered 100 to one by buddy who walks into the bike shop because he needs a new bike, and the salesman just wants to get bikes out the door.

The forward thinking approach would be to just determine that there are trails where they are suitable (official trails shuttle trails, downhill specific trails, motocycle trails, multi-use trails that have been taken over by bikes), and unsuitable (climb trails, 2-way trails with poor sight lines, busy multi-use where user conflicts are already occurring, anything unsanctioned/illegal), and develop a policy and let the e-bikers form their own association and beg to the hikers, horse riders and mountain bikers for expanded access. Maybe the riders will get bored of the few options then buy a real bike?

The problem is these things are being marketed as a "playing field leveler" so you can keep up with those friends and family that are such jerks that they won't even spin a couple of chill laps around the local adaptive loop with you or wait for you on the climb.

Does anyone here ride 2-way trails? It is terrifying that inexperienced riders can be just a couple of pedal strokes from 30km/hr on sections with poor visiblity. Sure a strava hunter could do the same, but there are only a handful of them, and they only last for 30mins.