New posts

Heard something... pedaling up

Oct. 14, 2006, 10:17 p.m.
Posts: 0
Joined: June 1, 2006

Today on the way to woodlot my friend told me that its legal to pedal up whistler and than come down for free. Catch is that if you fall, WBP's not liable. Is this true, or was i misinformed ?

Oct. 14, 2006, 10:20 p.m.
Posts: 2794
Joined: Feb. 29, 2004

Saw someone pedaling up today….it used to be kosher but not sure these days….

mtbskierdad

Oct. 14, 2006, 10:22 p.m.
Posts: 3158
Joined: Nov. 23, 2002

one dumb move…………

and it could be wrecked for all.

so stacy, what you're saying is that you'd never pedal up whistler?

We don't know what our limits are, so to start something with the idea of being limited actually ends up limiting us.
Ellen Langer

Oct. 14, 2006, 10:23 p.m.
Posts: 0
Joined: June 1, 2006

Id never do it, im just wondering if he was telling the truth. So apparantly he is ? The main reason i go to whistler is for the lift, i hate that 50 minute "hike and bike" stuff. At some places its worth it (woodlot/fromme) but others (whistler) doesnt seem to be. I wouldnt walk my bike for like half an hour to go down like A line :lol:

Oct. 14, 2006, 10:28 p.m.
Posts: 3158
Joined: Nov. 23, 2002

you could say that.

hee hee hee…………

lol - you're such a cool shit stacy. one of these days i gotta trail you down a-line

We don't know what our limits are, so to start something with the idea of being limited actually ends up limiting us.
Ellen Langer

Oct. 14, 2006, 10:39 p.m.
Posts: 5013
Joined: Aug. 29, 2004

I remember on WB's old website they talked about having both dh and xc riding and there were pictures from way up high on the mountain by the glaciers and stuff. no info about xc anymore though…

Oct. 14, 2006, 10:51 p.m.
Posts: 3146
Joined: April 19, 2005

it is not a easy hike either the chairlift is deceptive
or at least thats what ive been told

brokezors

Oct. 14, 2006, 11:04 p.m.
Posts: 0
Joined: March 26, 2005

It's crown land. They can't stop you, they don't own the land. But they would probably get pissed. I talked to some guy who hikes during the end of ski season when the lower mountain is melted. He said it is very fun with all the mud and what not. But to be on the safe side I never would.

Oct. 14, 2006, 11:21 p.m.
Posts: 0
Joined: June 1, 2006

Haha, i never would, i was just curious

Oct. 14, 2006, 11:41 p.m.
Posts: 2794
Joined: Feb. 29, 2004

It's crown land. They can't stop you, they don't own the land. But they would probably get pissed. I talked to some guy who hikes during the end of ski season when the lower mountain is melted. He said it is very fun with all the mud and what not. But to be on the safe side I never would.

Doesn't the WB own the land inbounds of the ski resort, therefore they can do whatever they want pending environmental interests?

mtbskierdad

Oct. 15, 2006, 1:33 a.m.
Posts: 1469
Joined: March 14, 2005

Doesn't the WB own the land inbounds of the ski resort, therefore they can do whatever they want pending environmental interests?

It's very rare for a resort to privately own the land that they use.

This is your birthday pony.

Oct. 15, 2006, 2:23 a.m.
Posts: 0
Joined: June 1, 2006

at the end of the day theres not much they can do, theres no season pass to take off you and they cant physically stop you.

I'd imagine their attitude is similar to their take on the unofficial trails.

anyway havent you all had enough of a-line? im getting some much needed valley trail riding in.

Oct. 15, 2006, 6:34 a.m.
Posts: 291
Joined: March 26, 2005

Today on the way to woodlot my friend told me that its legal to pedal up whistler and than come down for free. Catch is that if you fall, WBP's not liable. Is this true, or was i misinformed ?

Why don't you send an email to the legal guys for Whistler and pose that question. I understand there is nothing that prevents a citizen from hiking up that mountain (try the singing pass trail for starters).

Oct. 15, 2006, 9:02 a.m.
Posts: 1094
Joined: Sept. 13, 2004

I think they OWN the land. Not crown land. They were the only place in SW BC that stayed opened during the backcountry access ban a few years back.

Oct. 15, 2006, 9:41 a.m.
Posts: 0
Joined: March 26, 2005

No, it would cost way to much to buy that land. Anyone who says they can build a profitable ski resort that supports tourism can get the land for lease. Thats the situation with Hemlock, they didn't fulfill their contract so the government shut them down. I'm pretty sure it's the same with Whistler. It was even the original test project for the program (http://www.cserv.gov.bc.ca/lgd/gov_structure/library/mountain_resorts_association_guide.pdf)
And heres a map outlining government owned lands in the Sea-to-Sky region.
http://ilmbwww.gov.bc.ca/ilmb/lup/lrmp/coast/s2s/images/planarea_images/sslrmp_clr2.jpg

Forum jump: