What he means is lets see the calculations!
had to make a bunch of assumptions. but the objective was to have the rider be flatter on the take-off, less of a steep diving board like the previous version. land further back in the transition before the bank so that there is more time to make the left turn, also someone can go deeper if they choose and get more air time, still have time to make the bank with room to spare. i never got the measurements off of the old ramp in, so ran a couple examples. i went very conservative on the height of the new drop versus the old one, it's not 30 cm lower, but I assumed it was way shorter as a safe bet. also, in the numbers below did not calculate distance traveled down and laterally beyond the base of the drop, the landing was shaped between 35 and 40 deg, can't remember off the top of my head. somewhere in my pile of notes and scribbles.
assumed rider speed: 4 m/s
old drop: h=2.1 m
take-off angle: -20 deg.
horizontal distance: 2.0 m
t= 0.5 s
take-off angle: -15 deg.
horizontal distance: 2.2 m
t= 0.6 s
take-off angle: -10 deg.
horizontal distance: 2.3 m
t= 0.6 s
new drop: h=1.8 m
take-off angle: -8 deg.
horizontal distance: 2.2 m
t= 0.6 s
The current slope of the drop is -8 deg, and I remember the old ramp being steeper than the current one, so I figured it was something in the -10 to -15 deg range. I don't think it was as steep as -20 deg.
I was hoping to make the drop higher, but the real estate behind, i.e. the run in didn't really allow for it and I didn't want to build a climb up and down again like the previous version. anyway, it works. on to the next project.
"You know what's wrong with Vancouver? You can't pee off of your own balcony without getting in trouble"
- Phil Gordon