as a filmer its a tough one. during filming I have spent hours filling solid berms with loose dust and dirt just to get the Roost flying. I have also built berms (in NewZealand) specifically to destroy.
however afterwards I will always make sure the berm is tip top before we move on (except for the purpose built ones)
Roost in films looks good. riding corners straight got played out and roost often looks better in the golden light. it is a fun way to ride a bike under the right circumstances.
now with racing coming back in a very strong way drifting and roosting turns is becoming a popular way to ride. thats just the way riding as a whole is going(as far as the most dominant group is concerned)
with my very limited experiance on the shore as far as I can tell it is a world of its own. therefor the trails are not built to promote this sort of riding. they seem to me to be built for a different type of flow.
Dirt on the shore is like gold. and it tends to be fairly scarce. it seems to evacuate from the ground very fast under normal riding let alone roosting turns.
trails can be built to stand up to this sort of abuse ,but I dont think the dirt on the shore stands up to it particully well.
so maybe if we promote saving that sort of riding for whistler ,we can keep the dirt (or loam?) intact and have a drifting good time in the apropriate places.
also if you go out and session a turn and blow it to pieces ,pat it back together. the more ya do it ,sometimes the berm just gets better and better.
Now I apologise for the terrible spelling. being a camera operator doesnt promote good typing skills.
I also apologise if I got ways off track ,im a visitor here on the shore and havent quite gotten a full hold on the scene here or how it works.