No Trespassing signs on CMHC lands and trails

Is it just me…or does it seem like most of "uncle scrooge's" posts in this thread are gone now?

you are a shifty one aren't you Mr Colbert? :evil:

Credit goes to the DNV and Councillor Bond for the heavy lifting on the CMHC issues. Please note this not over yet as details of how the CMHC and RSTBC will collaborate with all users has not been ironed out yet. Please also note that the CMHC and RSTBC statememt did not address organized or commercial events. Therefore the status of trail running clinjcs, the Kneeknacker, BCBR, Fivers or organized trail days is still indeterminate.

For the sake of being complete here is a post by someone logged in as Hazen Colbert on the North Shore News.

Link is here

http://www.nsnews.com/news/breaking-cmhc-reverses-north-vancouver-trail-ban-1.2385391

Hazen Colbert North Vancouver
20 hours ago

"I will be meeting with the NSMBA and its legal counsel in November to discuss, among other things, respectful and reasonable trail use by mountain bikers. I will ask the NSMBA to abide by International Mountain Bike Association guidelines that all bike trails be signed and one-way, and that bikers dismount when approaching hikers and equestrians.. I will request the NSMBA, who receive $100,0000 a year from the DNV with no requirement they account for how the money is spent, respect the DNV's anti-bullying policy or their grant will be at risk I will also raise with DNV Council a requirement that all mountain bike trail users require a permit with a nominal fee, and that irresponsible behaviour including irresponsible riding and unauthorized trail and structure building result in revocation of the permit and a ban on access to what are public lands as is the case elsewhere. Trails are for all including hikers, runners and dog walkers, stakeholders who have a right to safety on public land."

seems to me that Mr. Colbert should review the anti-bullying policy himself.

and as far as permits go, what is good for one user group should be good for all.I would also like to know if Mr Colbert understands who does most of the heavy lifting to provide and maintane that trail network.

Agreed, FLATCH. Why single out mountain bikers? If permits are required, Hazin' and his nephews should pay this nominal fee to go on their hikes, along with all other users of the trails. Just shows how one sided and flawed this guy's thought process is.

Someone should post up the screenshots of his posts so that he isn't able to hide from all the bullying and threatening he has done.

I'm pretty sure when you delete a post here, it's only gone from the public eye. The board admin still has a record of them.

actually after a second cup of coffee and some further reflection upon Mr.Colbert's(Uncle Scrooge's) behavior in this thread I'm starting to think never mind local politics, he belongs in Ottawwa.

Why would NSMBA and their legal counsel meet with Colbert who is just another citizen? That statement makes it sound as though Colbert has some official capacity. If he is not an elected official there is no reason to meet with him.

Is it just me…or does it seem like most of "uncle scrooge's" posts in this thread are gone now?

i'd be deleting the old web server after that epic unhinged meltdown.

Breaking news…..Angry old white guy yells at dirt. Outrage on How the Shore Spins at 11.

If Uncle McStooge is going to meet with the other parties involved then it would be a good idea for the nsmba to be present and in on the conversation. Just to keep the misinformation to a minimum.
He has already shown he flat out can't be trusted no matter which side of the fence you're on.

Is this where someone pulls out the log of ip addresses?