Hello Cypress Riders!
The DWV recently published its Draft Plan for Trails on Public Land. It is available here.
You have probably noticed AlanBs previous threads on NSMB about the evolving (albeit slowly!) land oversight situation in West Van; he has brought me into the discussion.
This Plan relates mostly to the trails on public land, but within the Plan, the District is placing high importance on collaboration with private land owners regarding the use of their lands by various user groups. So I wouldn’t view this effort as impacting only the trails that are on District land. This is bigger than that. The District is asking for near-term feedback from the public.
Now is the time to speak up if you want to be heard!
You can do so in a number of ways:
1) Probably the most important is that you contact the District directly with your feedback on the Plan. You can do so by emailing: [email protected].
2) Post in this thread. The District will be made aware of this thread. Please be constructive!
3) There is no right/wrong/clear pathway so if you have any ideas, feel free to pursue those in parallel, post here, whatever. This is about making sure that mtb’ers have a voice and making sure that the District knows that this discussion matters.
We have a narrow window to influence the Plan. The final Plan will determine the fate of the trails in DWV and the public is being invited to provide comments BY FRIDAY OCT 20th.
I will leave the interpretation of the report to each of you, but my summary is:
1) Mountain Biking is not a currently recognized (or acknowledged) activity in the DWV,
2) The District is aware that Mountain biking has been occurring for decades on both public and private lands, but
3) Mtb’ing has been occurring on unauthorized trails,
4) The DWV recognizes that mtb’ing is an important activity to both residents and visitors,
5) The District now places high priority on recognizing Mountain Biking as an activity, but
6) The District is also very concerned about new rogue trail building, however
7) The District seems to place much blame on rogue trail building on the fact that there is no mechanism for the mtb community to discuss anything to do with Mountain Biking because it is not a recognized activity.
To me, it appears that the District wishes to install a mechanism to discuss the trails with the riding community – which in my view means two things: It is willing to acknowledge riding in the forest (good!) and it wants mtb'ing overseen. Oversight will result in changes, which could be good or bad for us.
The discussion is starting – you have until Oct 20th to provide feedback. Please email [email protected] with your views, post here and if you’re interested in becoming involved, AlanB and I would like to hear from you.
Come one come all. Preserve the GNAR!!!!