New posts

[nbr] hello

July 18, 2006, 6:26 p.m.
Posts: 0
Joined: Aug. 5, 2003

fucked up exposure on this one

July 18, 2006, 6:31 p.m.
Posts: 1093
Joined: March 6, 2004

what happened to the sweet water mark faithless?

haha, jokes… Nice shots

All Pro All Reid All The Time
- 30D - 70-200 - 17-85 - wizards -

July 18, 2006, 6:32 p.m.
Posts: 4044
Joined: June 20, 2003

1st and 3rd are amazing Majin

Adrenalize

July 18, 2006, 7:10 p.m.
Posts: 0
Joined: Aug. 5, 2003

watermarks were annoying me. So today I bought a 70-300.

Don't ask why.

July 18, 2006, 7:14 p.m.
Posts: 5189
Joined: March 21, 2005

I like the 3rd one. Sunsets get boring, but once in a while, I enjoy them.

wow, M&M, you're a fucking dick!

don't be so politically correct, this is stacy kohut, not fucking rick hansen your talkin too……..

July 18, 2006, 9:22 p.m.
Posts: 0
Joined: Aug. 5, 2003

you stitch is f*cked in the panoramic.

and you do know you can compensate for incorrect exposure really easily in photoshop?

yes. Those photos were jpeg, was too lazy to raw each one :P

July 18, 2006, 9:23 p.m.
Posts: 2625
Joined: Feb. 20, 2005

Don't encourage him in PS. Riley is the only person who is good at PS, ever.

I hate gnarwhale.com a lot.

bike mag sucks, so do one footers

i think your just jealous

July 18, 2006, 9:25 p.m.
Posts: 370
Joined: May 15, 2004

yes. Those photos were jpeg, was too lazy to raw each one :P

why would it matter if its jpg? just learn to use the eraser or what ever to ger rid of the stich mark

troup you are sooo funnny buy a gun and shoot yourself

No, I'm a retard, remember?

July 18, 2006, 9:28 p.m.
Posts: 7769
Joined: Nov. 23, 2002

haha, just use canon photostitch…rossco could use it. :lol:

"Fullness of knowledge always means some understanding of the depths of our ignorance; and that is always conducive to humility and reverence." - Robert Millikan

July 19, 2006, 12:31 a.m.
Posts: 0
Joined: Aug. 5, 2003

haha, just use canon photostitch…rossco could use it. :lol:

I am.

July 19, 2006, 12:32 a.m.
Posts: 0
Joined: Aug. 5, 2003

If you are talking about the bad stitch: :lol:

If you are talking about incorrect exposure because they are jpegs: :lol:

Why?

I could fix any exposure issues, Easier if I just converted from raw you nub.

July 19, 2006, 1:14 a.m.
Posts: 0
Joined: Aug. 5, 2003

Because I was lazzzzzzzzzy.

Btw was it you that took those wicked pics last year from the highgrounds overlooking the festival of lights (that seemed to get alot of vancouver int he shot?

I really want to know where that is.

or maybe it was del :/

July 19, 2006, 7:30 a.m.
Posts: 0
Joined: May 7, 2005

I could fix any exposure issues, Easier if I just converted from raw you nub.

ooooo, faithless = photo pro

davidlang.me |

July 19, 2006, 10:29 a.m.
Posts: 2590
Joined: Nov. 28, 2002

ooooo, faithless = photo pro

faithless = sucker

MSN me at: [email protected]
www.bigringbikes.cjb.net
www.cyberetrothreads.com

July 19, 2006, 11:02 a.m.
Posts: 0
Joined: Aug. 5, 2003

ooooo, faithless = photo pro

Careful, My thoughts is invalid.

Forum jump: