Posted by: tungsten
Do you think Bidens name will actually be on the ballot in Nov?
Trump.
Have you heard about the missile “Space Force“ (still makes me smile), has developed? Donald has given it a pet name. He calls it The Super Duper Missile. I bet Donny jr and Barron get one for Christmas.
Posted by: KenN
Posted by: tungsten
some bullshit
Bull
Shit
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/
It really is not that hard to look at what the polling is doing. I think FiveThirtyEight suffers from the same lack of trust the greater media world suffers from people like tungsten and shogun even though they just amalgamate the polling data into something more useful.
I not promoting any agenda when posting polls. Just fyi that moment time/space, eh?
Tuesday, May 12
Race/Topic (Click to Sort) Poll Results Spread
Wisconsin: Trump vs. Biden Marquette Biden 46, Trump 43 Biden +3
Ohio: Trump vs. Biden Emerson Trump 46, Biden 43 Trump +3
Texas: Trump vs. Biden Emerson Trump 47, Biden 41 Trump +6
California: Trump vs. Biden Emerson Biden 59, Trump 29 Biden +30
President Trump Job Approval CNN Approve 46, Disapprove 51 Disapprove +5
President Trump Job Approval The Hill/HarrisX Approve 51, Disapprove 49 Approve +2
Last edited by: tungsten on May 19, 2020, 10:01 a.m., edited 1 time in total.
lol... moar bad news
Though the corporate media is trying to bury it, the Russiagate narrative has in the past few weeks finally collapsed with the revelation that CrowdStrike had no evidence Russia took anything from the DNC servers and that the FBI set a perjury trap for Gen. Michael Flynn. There was already the previous government finding that there was no collusion between Trump and Russia and the indictment of a Russian troll farm that supposedly was destroying American democracy with $100,000 in Facebook ads was dropped after the St. Petersburg defendants sought discovery.
All that’s left is to discover how this all happened.
Attorney General William Barr, and U.S. Attorney John Durham, whom Barr commissioned to investigate this whole sordid mess seem intent on getting to the bottom of it. The possibility that Trump will not chicken out this time, and rather will challenge the Security State looms large since he felt personally under attack.
Given the diffident attitude the Security State plotters adopted regarding hiding their tracks, Durham’s challenge, with subpoena power, is not as formidable as were he, for example, investigating a Mafia family.
Plus, former NSA Director Adm. Michael S. Rogers reportedly is cooperating. The handwriting is on the wall. It remains to be seen what kind of role in the scandal Barack Obama may have played.
Fun, eh?
https://consortiumnews.com/2020/05/19/ray-mcgovern-turn-out-the-lights-russiagate-is-over/
Posted by: KenN
Posted by: tungsten
Bull
Shit
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
“A CNN poll released on Wednesday found Mr. Biden leading the president by five percentage points nationwide, but trailing by seven points among voters in crucial battleground states…for some Democrats, the results of the CNN poll again raised the specter that Mr. Biden could win the popular vote but lose the Electoral College, as Hillary Clinton and Al Gore both did.” - NYT's
https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/13/politics/cnn-poll-2020/index.html
Then post the numbers for the battleground states. Why so coy?
And screw Greenwald. The narrative over Russia was controlled by Trump. Russia interfered in the election and it got him elected. Full stop. It was Trump saying "no collusion" 10 times a day because that is what he wanted people talking about and not what Russia did. Now, this is what he wants and you dummies eat it up. It is a true nothingburger. Greenwald's shaky reputation is on the line so he is pretty eager to shape his own narrative.
Allow me to explain because Greenwald doesn't know shit about computers apparently.
This is what they said in this so-called bombshell.
"There's no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. There's circumstantial evidence - but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated." Shawn Henry - Crowdstrike
Russiagate is over!! No, it's not. Here is there clarification after everyone from Greenwald to Hannity got vindication boners because they wanted it so bad.
CrowdStrike Statement of Response:
The suggestion that CrowdStrike ‘had no proof’ of the data being exfiltrated is incorrect. Shawn Henry clearly said in his testimony that CrowdStrike had indicators of exfiltration ( page 32 of the testimony) and circumstantial evidence (page 75) that indicated the data had been exfiltrated. Also, please note that the Senate Intelligence Committee in April 2020 issued a report (https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report_Volume4.pdf/) validating the previous conclusions of the Intelligence community that Russia was behind the DNC data breach.
This sentence is a mischaracterisation of Henry’s testimony: “While he claimed the network environment had been cleaned up by the remediation, Henry also said that in September another attack was noticed which CrowdStrike could not mitigate with the tools used to fix the first attack.” On page 28 of the testimony, Henry says "the second breach was in an environment that had not - did not have our technology deployed into it." There is no indication of any subsequent breaches taking place on the DNC’s corporate network or any machines protected by CrowdStrike Falcon.
So basically they had circumstantial evidence that the Russians broke into the server (backed up by Senate intel) and there were also indicators that the data had been stolen, just no proof that it had been stolen by Russians. In other words, it was the goddamn Russians. Or do you think they broke into the server and left the data? If the far left would stop carrying Trump's water it would be really helpful.
Last edited by: chupacabra on May 20, 2020, 2:04 p.m., edited 1 time in total.
Nope. Dems and their enablers are just as vile and conniving as the repugnatones. Both are a danger to the republic. Or what remains of it.
“I tested very positively in another sense, so, this morning, yeah, I tested positively toward negative, right? So, no. I tested perfectly this morning, meaning I tested negative. But that’s a way of saying it. Positively toward the negative.”
- DJT
Last edited by: KenN on May 21, 2020, 2:52 p.m., edited 1 time in total.
Longtime climate activist
@RL_Miller
was just elected to the DNC.
Her first priority?
"I really hope to be able to tell Tom Perez, to his face, to fuck off."
Guccifer 2.0 fabricated evidence to claim credit for hacking the DNC (using files that were really Podesta attachments).
Guccifer 2.0’s Russian breadcrumbs mostly came from deliberate processes & needless editing of documents.
Guccifer 2.0’s Russian communications signals came from the persona choosing to use a proxy server in Moscow and choosing to use a Russian VPN service as end-points (and they used an email service that forwards the sender’s IP address, which made identifying that signal a relatively trivial task.)
A considerable volume of evidence pointed at Guccifer 2.0’s activities being in American timezones (twice as many types of indicators were found pointing at Guccifer 2.0’s activities being in American timezones than anywhere else).
The American timezones were incidental to other activities (eg. blogging, social media, emailing a journalist, archiving files, etc) and some of these were recorded independently by service providers.
A couple of pieces of evidence with Russian indicators present had accompanying locale indicators that contradicted this which suggested the devices used hadn’t been properly set up for use in Russia (or Romania) but may have been suitable for other countries (including America).
https://consortiumnews.com/2020/05/21/guccifer-2-0s-hidden-agenda/
Last edited by: tungsten on May 21, 2020, 9:07 p.m., edited 1 time in total.
Posted by: KenN
“I tested very positively in another sense, so, this morning, yeah, I tested positively toward negative, right? So, no. I tested perfectly this morning, meaning I tested negative. But that’s a way of saying it. Positively toward the negative.”
- DJT
Is that a real quote?
Posted by: heckler
Posted by: KenN
“I tested very positively in another sense, so, this morning, yeah, I tested positively toward negative, right? So, no. I tested perfectly this morning, meaning I tested negative. But that’s a way of saying it. Positively toward the negative.”
- DJT
Is that a real quote?
Can't make this shit up ...
https://news.yahoo.com/trump-coronavirus-test-i-tested-positively-toward-the-negative-181413918.html
Funny thing is yesterday a coworker announced his wife tested positive in a zoom meeting.
.
.
.
.
They're having a baby.
Forum jump:
