New posts

Trump.

Oct. 4, 2019, 9:13 p.m.
Posts: 14149
Joined: Dec. 30, 2002

Posted by: chupacabra

Biden hasnt been named the 2020 Candidate yet - it's not abuse of power or anything of the such. You could probably say its Trump trying to fight back. Emphasis on trying.

Biden doesn't need to be the candidate for this to be an abuse of power.  He could have them investigate Rosie O'Donnell and it would still be an abuse of power.

Lets use a local example of Huawei's CFO Meng whoeverzhou. 

By your logic, if Trump asked whichever agency that actually detained her to detain her in the first place, publicly announced or otherwise, then it's abuse of powers?

BUT since whichever Canadian authority acted under the guise of the SPP (security and prosperity act), which is a working agreement between the USA and Canada much like what Ukraine and the USA has, then thats not abuse of power?

Oct. 4, 2019, 9:15 p.m.
Posts: 14149
Joined: Dec. 30, 2002

Posted by: FLATCH

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

So thats it then - you guys are just jealous their strategy worked?

As a random aside - are you more hopeful for impeachment or for the 2020 vote?

Not jealous of the strategy, disappointed sure. To me that’s not true democracy. I believe one person one vote. If that were the case Don would still be ripping off people in real estate instead of everyone.

As for your side note, I’m hoping for impeachment. Losing the election would be far too quick and clean.

So you're with Trump on VoterID laws but not legal immigration?

As for the side note, lets just say you have a long 5 years ahead.

Oct. 4, 2019, 9:19 p.m.
Posts: 14149
Joined: Dec. 30, 2002

Posted by: chupacabra

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

Anyone else read the Judicial Watch piece aboot Mueller & Rosenstein?

LOL.  Nope.

Ya who needs the results of multiple FOIA's regarding the majority of things we banter on about.

Oct. 4, 2019, 10:27 p.m.
Posts: 797
Joined: Nov. 6, 2006

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

Posted by: FLATCH

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

So thats it then - you guys are just jealous their strategy worked?

As a random aside - are you more hopeful for impeachment or for the 2020 vote?

Not jealous of the strategy, disappointed sure. To me that’s not true democracy. I believe one person one vote. If that were the case Don would still be ripping off people in real estate instead of everyone.

As for your side note, I’m hoping for impeachment. Losing the election would be far too quick and clean.

So you're with Trump on VoterID laws but not legal immigration?

As for the side note, lets just say you have a long 5 years ahead.

Don’t put words in my mouth, I’m not with don on anything. But since you asked, I believe if you are in the country legally and you pay taxes you are entitled to vote.

Oct. 4, 2019, 10:32 p.m.
Posts: 2215
Joined: May 23, 2006

Posted by: FLATCH

, I’m hoping for impeachment.

Which kind?... https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/10/04/impeachment-brought-to-you-by-the-cia/


 Last edited by: tungsten on Oct. 4, 2019, 10:33 p.m., edited 1 time in total.
Oct. 4, 2019, 10:33 p.m.
Posts: 11419
Joined: June 4, 2008

Posted by: FLATCH

Don’t put words in my mouth, I’m not with don on anything. But since you asked, I believe if you are in the country legally and you pay taxes you are entitled to vote.

I didn't have an opinion on this until recently.  I live in Whistler and have a ton of friends who are here on PR and love it here.  It made me mad that they couldn't vote.

Then I learned about the QIIP and how our federal Liberal party loves the CCP.

We need to differentiate between PR people who want to live here and cunts who want to treat our housing stock as investment vehicles. 

The latter we need to curb-stomp.

Oct. 4, 2019, 10:57 p.m.
Posts: 14149
Joined: Dec. 30, 2002

Posted by: FLATCH

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

So you're with Trump on VoterID laws but not legal immigration?

As for the side note, lets just say you have a long 5 years ahead.

Don’t put words in my mouth, I’m not with don on anything. But since you asked, I believe if you are in the country legally and you pay taxes you are entitled to vote.

.. on your tax paying voting belief, should they have to show ID?

Oct. 5, 2019, 6:37 a.m.
Posts: 797
Joined: Nov. 6, 2006

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

Posted by: FLATCH

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

So you're with Trump on VoterID laws but not legal immigration?

As for the side note, lets just say you have a long 5 years ahead.

Don’t put words in my mouth, I’m not with don on anything. But since you asked, I believe if you are in the country legally and you pay taxes you are entitled to vote.

.. on your tax paying voting belief, should they have to show ID?

yes, of course, or like here you must be registered

Oct. 6, 2019, 5:58 p.m.
Posts: 14149
Joined: Dec. 30, 2002

Posted by: ReductiMat

Then I learned about the QIIP and how our federal Liberal party loves the CCP.

We need to differentiate between PR people who want to live here and cunts who want to treat our housing stock as investment vehicles. 

The latter we need to curb-stomp.

CCP being the Canadian Commie Party? QIIP seems to be a provincial initative and I doubt Quebec is the only province to entice or expedite "foreign business" applications via such a initiative.

If you want to change the housing stock as a vehicle, protest to change the laws on foreign home ownership.

Curb stomping will not help your efforts and thats coming from a Surrey boy.

Oct. 6, 2019, 5:59 p.m.
Posts: 14149
Joined: Dec. 30, 2002

Posted by: FLATCH

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

Posted by: FLATCH

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

So you're with Trump on VoterID laws but not legal immigration?

As for the side note, lets just say you have a long 5 years ahead.

Don’t put words in my mouth, I’m not with don on anything. But since you asked, I believe if you are in the country legally and you pay taxes you are entitled to vote.

.. on your tax paying voting belief, should they have to show ID?

yes, of course, or like here you must be registered

Racist.

Oct. 6, 2019, 8:18 p.m.
Posts: 11419
Joined: June 4, 2008

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

CCP being the Canadian Commie Party? QIIP seems to be a provincial initative and I doubt Quebec is the only province to entice or expedite "foreign business" applications via such a initiative.

If you want to change the housing stock as a vehicle, protest to change the laws on foreign home ownership.

Curb stomping will not help your efforts and thats coming from a Surrey boy.

QIIP seems to be something you have no idea about.  Harper stopped it federally but didn't have the balls to stop it provincially.  Trudeau's party is in bed with the Mainland for certain, can't comment on the PCp.

The provincial NDP, or rather, David Eby is one smart mother fucker who is fiscally conservative and cares about the people who live here and has implemented a good first try.  Other nations are following his lead.

We will need guillotines.

Oct. 7, 2019, 3:49 a.m.
Posts: 797
Joined: Nov. 6, 2006

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

Posted by: FLATCH

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

Posted by: FLATCH

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

So you're with Trump on VoterID laws but not legal immigration?

As for the side note, lets just say you have a long 5 years ahead.

Don’t put words in my mouth, I’m not with don on anything. But since you asked, I believe if you are in the country legally and you pay taxes you are entitled to vote.

.. on your tax paying voting belief, should they have to show ID?

yes, of course, or like here you must be registered

Racist.

How is that racist? If you knew me you would know that’s far from true. In fact I find that terribly insulting.

Although I have thought the same of you. Ironic.


 Last edited by: FLATCH on Oct. 7, 2019, 3:55 a.m., edited 1 time in total.
Oct. 7, 2019, 9:18 a.m.
Posts: 10626
Joined: June 29, 2006

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

Posted by: chupacabra

Biden hasnt been named the 2020 Candidate yet - it's not abuse of power or anything of the such. You could probably say its Trump trying to fight back. Emphasis on trying.

Biden doesn't need to be the candidate for this to be an abuse of power.  He could have them investigate Rosie O'Donnell and it would still be an abuse of power.

Lets use a local example of Huawei's CFO Meng whoeverzhou. 

By your logic, if Trump asked whichever agency that actually detained her to detain her in the first place, publicly announced or otherwise, then it's abuse of powers?

BUT since whichever Canadian authority acted under the guise of the SPP (security and prosperity act), which is a working agreement between the USA and Canada much like what Ukraine and the USA has, then thats not abuse of power?

So, you are just going to go right ahead and pretend that there is no personal motive behind trump's action I see.  I guess it's really your only play here, so I don't blame you, but it begs the question, is Trump really concerned with corruption in Ukraine?  Follow up "Doesn't it make you question the odds that the one time Trump thinks America needs to confront global corruption it just so happens to also be into his apparent main rival in 2020 and his family?"

Oct. 7, 2019, 9:23 a.m.
Posts: 10626
Joined: June 29, 2006

Posted by: ReductiMat

Posted by: FLATCH

Don’t put words in my mouth, I’m not with don on anything. But since you asked, I believe if you are in the country legally and you pay taxes you are entitled to vote.

I didn't have an opinion on this until recently.  I live in Whistler and have a ton of friends who are here on PR and love it here.  It made me mad that they couldn't vote.

Then I learned about the QIIP and how our federal Liberal party loves the CCP.

We need to differentiate between PR people who want to live here and cunts who want to treat our housing stock as investment vehicles. 

The latter we need to curb-stomp.

I would love to see an investigation into the Chinese lobby across the country.  I am sure it would make the Russian efforts in the US seem quaint.

Oct. 7, 2019, 1:20 p.m.
Posts: 14149
Joined: Dec. 30, 2002

Posted by: ReductiMat

Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus

CCP being the Canadian Commie Party? QIIP seems to be a provincial initative and I doubt Quebec is the only province to entice or expedite "foreign business" applications via such a initiative.

If you want to change the housing stock as a vehicle, protest to change the laws on foreign home ownership.

Curb stomping will not help your efforts and thats coming from a Surrey boy.

QIIP seems to be something you have no idea about.  Harper stopped it federally but didn't have the balls to stop it provincially.  Trudeau's party is in bed with the Mainland for certain, can't comment on the PCp.

The provincial NDP, or rather, David Eby is one smart mother fucker who is fiscally conservative and cares about the people who live here and has implemented a good first try.  Other nations are following his lead.

We will need guillotines.

Quebec Immigrant Investor Program? I was looking for clarification on the CCP - there is actually is a federal commie party, federal socialist, and a marxist leninist party. So I wasnt actually sure which acronym you meant - even if you meant the subversive canadin legislators who are bought out by the mainland. Remember, Gregor Robertsons mother in law had "ties" to some mainlaind old commie party?

David Eby sounds like a nationalist. Gotta be careful if you identify with that 'round here. Makes you a white supremacist.

Forum jump: