it does seem to represent his line of thinking which is something that befuddles me. how can one think that running public education like private enterprise is a good thing?
And there is the crux of the whole matter. Those arguing in favour of the government are generally taking a "business case" position. That education, like any other business, should look for efficiencies … ways to cut costs, ways to achieve a certain outcome cheaply, 'efficiently'.
Our education system is not predicated on that position, nor should it be. We should be trying to give our next generation the best education we can give them, and cost/efficiency, while it should get some priority, is not the top priority.
It's interesting that the classical economists will argue that CEOs can demand multimillion dollar salaries "because that's what's needed to attract the best CEOs". But somehow that doesn't translate to those who are responsible for providing top-notch education for the next group of individuals who will be running the country, our businesses, our health care? What utter tripe.
When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity.
When many people suffer from a delusion, it is called religion.