Well this is fucky if real.
https://twitter.com/fukushimaexpos2/status/1304548466350149632?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
protect tom mcdonald at all costs
Well this is fucky if real.
https://twitter.com/fukushimaexpos2/status/1304548466350149632?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
protect tom mcdonald at all costs
Controlled burn?
It’s most likely a controlled burn, from a helicopter.
If the caption has the phrase “that they don’t want you to see!” In it than it’s probably bullshit.
If someone who’s generally full of shit (browse that twitter account for a bit) is telling you something amazing than it’s probably bullshit.
The fact that flamethrowing drones exist is the kernel of truth that makes the lie believable.
I sure hope they teach media literacy by the time my kids are in school.
but who will teach it to shogun?
Posted by: tashi
It’s most likely a controlled burn, from a helicopter.
If the caption has the phrase “that they don’t want you to see!” In it than it’s probably bullshit.
If someone who’s generally full of shit (browse that twitter account for a bit) is telling you something amazing than it’s probably bullshit.
The fact that flamethrowing drones exist is the kernel of truth that makes the lie believable.
I sure hope they teach media literacy by the time my kids are in school.
Especially if it is in a tweet that says the footage is something "Twitter doesn't want you to see".
Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus
Well this is fucky if real.
https://twitter.com/fukushimaexpos2/status/1304548466350149632?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
This is the perfect time for a little critical thinking. Ask a few questions.
If you were a would-be anarchist lighting forest fires would you light them right beside a highway or somewhere more remote where it would be hard to fight and easier to conceal?
Do you think the apparatus used to light those fires would fit on a drone? If so how big?
Is there any reason to think that this video is in fact from a drone?
The spread of false information wastes first responders time and puts people in jeopardy.
Imagine you’re a journalist doing his job and you have a rifle drawn on you by two dudes who think you’re a “looter”, out on an almost empty highway in the middle of a wildfire:
Fuck these false information, bullshit-spreading stupid fucking posts and the stupid fucks who post them. So glad I’m not active on Facebook and Twitter - what a cesspool of dangerously fucking stupid nonsense.
Posted by: tashi
The spread of false information wastes first responders time and puts people in jeopardy.
Imagine you’re a journalist doing his job and you have a rifle drawn on you by two dudes who think you’re a “looter”, out on an almost empty highway in the middle of a wildfire:
Fuck these false information, bullshit-spreading stupid fucking posts and the stupid fucks who post them. So glad I’m not active on Facebook and Twitter - what a cesspool of dangerously fucking stupid nonsense.
The spread of false information is self-perpetuating. To quote Mulder, these assholes want to believe.
Most commenters in the group flatly rejected the idea that they were believing and were spreading false information. One user said of alleged antifa arsonists, “So unless it’s tattooed on their forehead it’s not true??? I’ll judge for myself thank you.” Another remarked, “This is disappointing, especially when we know better. I feel like someone is running a large scale cover up from the top.”
Posted by: Sethimus
but who will teach it to shogun?
And modern American “conservatives” use the same tactics as the GRU to spread disinformation:
The only news comment more depressing than the CBC’s is Fox News. 🤦🏼
Who wants to tell me what? I would've replied earlier but you know, hash tag 2020 living.
Who knows about the TF-10 or 19 drone attachment? Only a $1500 USD flame throw attachment for drones and I supposed your limited by the drones distance and how much petrol you rig it for.And the pyro in me tells me if you want to get paid for arson, you'll need some evidence or verification in todays day and age of you doing just that, so thats a potential reason for source video.
Also, for those saying a controlled burn - are those necessary in rocky area's close to a road? Me thinks not. And once again, you guys need to pick up on my prefacing operating disclaimer's with phrases such as "if real", as in, arson and not a controlled burn.
This was written just for you.
http://inverse.com/article/37463-conspiracy-beliefs-illusory-pattern-perception
It was a video from a helicopter and it was in fact a controlled burn. Tashi was correct on all fronts. More bullshit from the snowflakes on the far right.
Twitter video does not show a drone starting West Coast wildfires
Posted by: chupacabra
It was a video from a helicopter and it was in fact a controlled burn. Tashi was correct on all fronts. More bullshit from the snowflakes on the far right.
Twitter video does not show a drone starting West Coast wildfires
Pretty sure a helo' would have a better camera... but so would a drone...
Just sayin'.
Forum jump: