New posts

Condoms.

Nov. 24, 2013, 9:51 a.m.
Posts: 15546
Joined: May 29, 2004

Yea the old abstinence .. Works every time…

Don't fuck, no baby. Pretty simple,except for Mary of course.

Nov. 24, 2013, 9:53 a.m.
Posts: 15546
Joined: May 29, 2004

They're promoting abstinence and ignorance.

Yes.

Kn.

The average christian is a little smarter than the rubes posting up crap on the interwebs…besides,where would your self worth lie if there were no low hanging fruit to pick?

You need people like that.

Nov. 24, 2013, 10 a.m.
Posts: 11904
Joined: June 4, 2008

Nov. 24, 2013, 10:24 a.m.
Posts: 8242
Joined: Dec. 23, 2003

Don't fuck, no baby. Pretty simple,except for Mary of course.

awesome..

Nov. 24, 2013, 12:58 p.m.
Posts: 15094
Joined: Nov. 20, 2002

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFgo9J_MRng

condom reference at 5:30 but actualy I think the whole damn segement is awesume

Nov. 24, 2013, 1:05 p.m.
Posts: 14115
Joined: Nov. 19, 2002

take her in the pooper..

case closed…:couple:

Nov. 25, 2013, 4:32 a.m.
Posts: 33648
Joined: Nov. 19, 2002

The average christian is a little smarter than the rubes posting up crap on the interwebs…besides,where would your self worth lie if there were no low hanging fruit to pick?

You need people like that.

It's part of his God complex.

It is easy to dodge our responsibilities, but we cannot dodge the consequences of dodging our responsibilities.
- Josiah Stamp

Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race.
- H.G. Wells

Nov. 25, 2013, 6:36 a.m.
Posts: 7967
Joined: March 8, 2006

take her in the pooper..

case closed…:couple:

Yeah see, right there you would be wrong.

Nov. 25, 2013, 7:40 a.m.
Posts: 16679
Joined: Nov. 20, 2002

It's part of his God complex.

Yes, I'm sure that's exactly it.

Your need to accuse non-believers of psychoses is indicative of a pretty tenuous grip on your faith.

Kn.

When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity.

When many people suffer from a delusion, it is called religion.

Nov. 25, 2013, 11:01 a.m.
Posts: 1089
Joined: Dec. 16, 2004

take her in the pooper..

case closed…:couple:

Not true, how do you think lawyers are born?

Nov. 25, 2013, 11:29 a.m.
Posts: 5329
Joined: Feb. 3, 2006

Don't fuck, no baby. Pretty simple,except for Mary of course.

I personally have no issue with teaching kids abstinence. Makes sense when taught in conjunction with additional sexual education. This is usually referred to as 'Abstinence Plus' education.

I have an issue with 'Abstinence ONLY' education, which is being promoted in the poorer southern states by the far Christian Right. They are finding higher incidences of teen pregnancy and STIs because teens aren't being taught that IF they decide to have sex, here's how to have safe sex, or that you can contract and STD by giving oral sex, having anal sex…etc, they are simply just taught not to have any kind of sex, period.

http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0024658;jsessionid=7E5D4CFA54B7D9BD98BC2432D43AD046

Among the 48 states in this analysis (all U.S. states except North Dakota and Wyoming), 21 states stressed abstinence-only education in their 2005 state laws and/or policies (level 3), 7 states emphasized abstinence education (level 2), 11 states covered abstinence in the context of comprehensive sex education (level 1), and 9 states did not mention abstinence (level 0) in their state laws or policies (Figure 1). In 2005, level 0 states had an average (± standard error) teen pregnancy rate of 58.78 (±4.96), level 1 states averaged 56.36 (±3.94), level 2 states averaged 61.86 (±3.93), and level 3 states averaged 73.24 (±2.58) teen pregnancies per 1000 girls aged 14–19 (Table 3). The level of abstinence education (no provision, covered, promoted, stressed) was positively correlated with both teen pregnancy (Spearman's rho = 0.510, p = 0.001) and teen birth (rho = 0.605, p[HTML_REMOVED]0.001) rates (Table 4), indicating that abstinence education in the U.S. does not cause abstinence behavior. To the contrary, teens in states that prescribe more abstinence education are actually more likely to become pregnant (Figure 2). Abortion rates were not correlated with abstinence education level (rho = ?0.136, p = 0.415). A multivariate analysis of teen pregnancy and birth rates identified the level of abstinence education as a significant influence on teen pregnancy and birth rates across states (pregnancies F = 5.620, p = 0.002; births F = 11.814, p[HTML_REMOVED]0.001). The significant pregnancy effect was caused by significantly lower pregnancy rates in level 0 (no abstinence provision) states compared to level 3 (abstinence stressed) states (p = 0.036), and level 1 (abstinence covered) states compared to level 3 states (p = 0.005); the significant birth effect was caused by significantly lower teen birth rates in level 0 states compared to level 3 (p = 0.006) states, and significantly lower teen birth rates in level 1 states compared to level 3 states (p[HTML_REMOVED]0.001).

So I guess my question to you is: Do you support 'Abstinence Plus' education, or 'Abstinence Only'?

Nov. 25, 2013, 12:20 p.m.
Posts: 3447
Joined: Dec. 2, 2002

I personally have no issue with teaching kids abstinence. Makes sense when taught in conjunction with additional sexual education. This is usually referred to as 'Abstinence Plus' education.

I have an issue with 'Abstinence ONLY' education, which is being promoted in the poorer southern states by the far Christian Right. They are finding higher incidences of teen pregnancy and STIs because teens aren't being taught that IF they decide to have sex, here's how to have safe sex, or that you can contract and STD by giving oral sex, having anal sex…etc, they are simply just taught not to have any kind of sex, period.

http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0024658;jsessionid=7E5D4CFA54B7D9BD98BC2432D43AD046

So I guess my question to you is: Do you support 'Abstinence Plus' education, or 'Abstinence Only'?

OMG look at those p-values, so statistically significant!

jake has come through for me before, I fully suspect he is just trying to find all his clothes and finishing up breakfast

Nov. 25, 2013, 12:36 p.m.
Posts: 16679
Joined: Nov. 20, 2002

OMG look at those p-values, so statistically significant!

So …

Stick in her but and p?

Kn.

When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity.

When many people suffer from a delusion, it is called religion.

Nov. 25, 2013, 12:47 p.m.
Posts: 14115
Joined: Nov. 19, 2002

Not true, how do you think lawyers are born?

haahh thats a good one ima have to borrow that…

:beer:

Nov. 25, 2013, 7:53 p.m.
Posts: 15546
Joined: May 29, 2004

I personally have no issue with teaching kids abstinence. Makes sense when taught in conjunction with additional sexual education. This is usually referred to as 'Abstinence Plus' education.

I have an issue with 'Abstinence ONLY' education, which is being promoted in the poorer southern states by the far Christian Right. They are finding higher incidences of teen pregnancy and STIs because teens aren't being taught that IF they decide to have sex, here's how to have safe sex, or that you can contract and STD by giving oral sex, having anal sex…etc, they are simply just taught not to have any kind of sex, period.

http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0024658;jsessionid=7E5D4CFA54B7D9BD98BC2432D43AD046

So I guess my question to you is: Do you support 'Abstinence Plus' education, or 'Abstinence Only'?

I guess I would be in the abstinence plus crowd.

Forum jump: