Posted by: aShogunNamedMarcus
Aaaaaand I'm still waiting on your answer from three quotes ago now. You guys are really bad for doing what you claim I do (not answering ?s). And how much winning do you think I'd be doing against the whole global climate science establishment? You guys just link up articles and accept it.
If I debase a conversation, perhaps you give yourselve's too much credit. Like I said, whats the point of this thread? Panic the masses? I was once accused of driving fear through the Ebola thread... ahhh memories.
And you realize if I wasnt posting in this thread, it'd be dead like the rest of NBR ?
1. Which question from three quotes ago?
2. I think the articles “we” link up tend to be backed up by peer reviewed research. That’s why we share them
3. The point of the thread, as has been stated already, is to talk about climate change and what’s driving it.
4. If you weren’t posting in this thread the rest of us would still be here discussing climate change and most likely in a less frustrating manner.
Here’s a suggestion, if you have something you think disputes climate change share it and let us know why you think this shows that climate change science is either not real or somehow faulty. And if you could do us a big favour, try and stick to one point at a time and deal with that before moving on.