Lol, what's a penalty anyways
Canucks / Bruins
No, he means Thornton. :lol:
Maybe they heard a Who?
Why slag free swag?:rolleyes:
ummm, as your doctor i recommend against riding with a scaphoid fracture.
I'm confused … was that Thornton or Horton? Need more info …
:P
Kn.
When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity.
When many people suffer from a delusion, it is called religion.
Maybe they heard a Who?
No, he's on first. What's on second.
Kn.
When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity.
When many people suffer from a delusion, it is called religion.
I don't know is on third.
Horton scrapped, Thornton dropped the gloves during the stoppage of play
Why slag free swag?:rolleyes:
ummm, as your doctor i recommend against riding with a scaphoid fracture.
I don't know is on third.
Horton scrapped, Thornton dropped the gloves during the stoppage of play
Got it ..
Kn.:dizzy:
When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity.
When many people suffer from a delusion, it is called religion.
K, that was weird … watching the whole PP live from the behind the net cam. It kind of felt like watching a replay …
Kn.
When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity.
When many people suffer from a delusion, it is called religion.
S'okay … refs on the ice can't even see when the puck is iced.
Kn.
oh ken, you crack me up. your fan boy-ness is strong today ;)
http://www.nhl.com/ice/page.htm?id=26494
The Linesman shall have discretion to wave off apparent icing infractions on attempted passes if those passes are deemed receivable (attainable). In order for the Linesman to wash out the icing for this reason, the receiving players stick must be on the attacking side of the center red line and he must be eligible to receive the pass (e.g. he cannot be in an off-side position and cannot be involved in a player change that would result in a too many men on the ice penalty if he were to play the puck).
Fuck Brad Marchand. When will someone on the Canucks step up to that little rat???
Yes, I'm quoting myself. Somebody needs to tune that guy up. Preferably Bieksa.
Fuck Brad Marchand. When will someone on the Canucks step up to that little rat???
Guess they don't have to worry bout Marchand any longer.
Kn.
When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity.
When many people suffer from a delusion, it is called religion.
actually watching this game i'm really surprised at how sloppy the canucks play a lot of the time. i don't know if it's just this game as i haven't followed them at all this year but their passing is just atrocious and their positional play is pretty poor at times too.
We don't know what our limits are, so to start something with the idea of being limited actually ends up limiting us.
Ellen Langer
oh ken, you crack me up. your fan boy-ness is strong today ;)
Yes, and the commentators has some fun with the linesman's idea of a 'receivable' pass … I think the remark was "you'd have to be taller than Chara to be able to get that pass'.
Kn.
When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity.
When many people suffer from a delusion, it is called religion.
^When the replay was shown from the Bruins end you could see the puck went right by one Canucks forward who made no attempt to play the puck, before both d-men did almost the same thing
Why slag free swag?:rolleyes:
ummm, as your doctor i recommend against riding with a scaphoid fracture.
^When the replay was shown from the Bruins end you could see the puck went right by one Canucks forward who made no attempt to play the puck, before both d-men did almost the same thing
Thanks Punky. Looked pretty obvious to me. But hell.. what do i know? I only played the game for 20 years and refereed for 10 of them.
Yes, and the commentators has some fun with the linesman's idea of a 'receivable' pass … I think the remark was "you'd have to be taller than Chara to be able to get that pass'.
Kn.
Never take John Garrat seriously
Forum jump:
