New posts

buying an apartment

March 10, 2014, 3:56 p.m.
Posts: 712
Joined: Aug. 10, 2010

I currently live here:

Otherwise known as next to the new condo developments near the Olympic 'Village'. Jeez, what a miserable looking collection of apartment blocks. All destined to look even more utterly shit in 30 years time. I will be amazed and saddened if people want to 'invest' in these properties.

This one wins the award for being the most pretentious marketing exercise:

http://www.cressey.com/meccanica/

Vancouver building tomorrow's slums today!

Shredding hypothetical gnarr

March 10, 2014, 5:25 p.m.
Posts: 351
Joined: March 4, 2013

wait til all the glass starts failing on the recent curtain wall condos. this glass is rated for a 25 year lifetime, if transported and installed absolutely perfectly - which it often is not. this will likely be our next "leaky condo" type situation.

March 10, 2014, 5:45 p.m.
Posts: 429
Joined: Feb. 28, 2005

My point wasn't that I would have $500,000 to live off but that I wouldn't have to pay $????.?? a month in rent (this number rises with the housing market but seems to be much slower to drop when the housing market does). I will have about $2,000.00 a month more in disposable income once she is paid off.

I may also be able to downsize if I choose - I doubt I will because I love my pad and hate moving - but I could freeing up some cash. Or, I could rent it out whilst I rent a pad in warmer climes, or I could borrow cheap cash against it if I want to purchase commercial property or a business (I've actually already done this)

Remember that if that 500k was making 5%, you'd have just under 2000/month after taxes to rent wherever you wanted and no realtor fees to pay if you do decide to downsize.

I realize that home ownership makes sense for a lot of people that want stability and need a forced savings program so I'm not going to argue that renting is the best for everyone in all situations. But what I see ALL the time is young people that want to do the right thing with their money and are convinced by their parents/friends that housing is the only way to go, and that's just not true. Buy the right condo and you put 500 a month toward equity. Great. After 5 years, you've paid 30 grand off the mortgage. Rent, put the difference away, and after 5 years, you still have that 30,000, but you don't have to pay a 20,000 commission to get your hands on your money. A lot can change in 5 years if you're twentysomething, and there's an excellent chance that at the end of those years, the 700 sqft 1 bed you bought won't be such a good fit for your wife, girlfriend, new job, baby, or Great Dane.

People talk about having a house paid off in 25 years, but how can they be sure that they're going to be in the same place for longer than they've even been alive? And if they're not, how will they feel when they see their "gains" are wiped out by Realtor fees?

If you can afford it and are SURE you're staying put for 5 years or more, owning a home can be a rewarding experience, and when you move, you'll probably have some money to show for it. But it's not your only option. Being a saver is sexy too, and if you can stick with it and not blow all your money on ipads, rims, and trips to Cancun, you'll be further ahead at the end of those 5 years when you have a better idea of what the hell you're going to do with your life.

Start with 200 bucks a month. Put it in the bank. Make it an automatic payment. Don't touch it. Increase payments when you think you can. If you stick with it, you're way ahead of anyone who buys a condo in Vancouver with 5% down in the next few years.

March 10, 2014, 5:55 p.m.
Posts: 3154
Joined: Nov. 23, 2002

^^^

that's a much better and far more reasonable take on the situation than what you previously stated.

We don't know what our limits are, so to start something with the idea of being limited actually ends up limiting us.
Ellen Langer

March 10, 2014, 8:02 p.m.
Posts: 7707
Joined: Sept. 11, 2003

Another advantage of owning/mortgaging your primary residence is that if you sell, any appreciation in the sale value is tax-free. Its not the be-all-and-end-all, but another potential advantage.

March 10, 2014, 8:52 p.m.
Posts: 549
Joined: Sept. 2, 2010

Remember that if that 500k was making 5%, you'd have just under 2000/month after taxes to rent wherever you wanted and no realtor fees to pay if you do decide to downsize.

I realize that home ownership makes sense for a lot of people that want stability and need a forced savings program so I'm not going to argue that renting is the best for everyone in all situations. But what I see ALL the time is young people that want to do the right thing with their money and are convinced by their parents/friends that housing is the only way to go, and that's just not true. Buy the right condo and you put 500 a month toward equity. Great. After 5 years, you've paid 30 grand off the mortgage. Rent, put the difference away, and after 5 years, you still have that 30,000, but you don't have to pay a 20,000 commission to get your hands on your money. A lot can change in 5 years if you're twentysomething, and there's an excellent chance that at the end of those years, the 700 sqft 1 bed you bought won't be such a good fit for your wife, girlfriend, new job, baby, or Great Dane.

People talk about having a house paid off in 25 years, but how can they be sure that they're going to be in the same place for longer than they've even been alive? And if they're not, how will they feel when they see their "gains" are wiped out by Realtor fees?

If you can afford it and are SURE you're staying put for 5 years or more, owning a home can be a rewarding experience, and when you move, you'll probably have some money to show for it. But it's not your only option. Being a saver is sexy too, and if you can stick with it and not blow all your money on ipads, rims, and trips to Cancun, you'll be further ahead at the end of those 5 years when you have a better idea of what the hell you're going to do with your life.

Start with 200 bucks a month. Put it in the bank. Make it an automatic payment. Don't touch it. Increase payments when you think you can. If you stick with it, you're way ahead of anyone who buys a condo in Vancouver with 5% down in the next few years.

I generally agree with what you are saying, just in my scenario in retirement you have the asset and no rent. In yours you have the asset but you're paying rent and you're doing it with after tax $.
So your $2000 may only be 1500 or so

But you're right - only buy if you can afford it

March 10, 2014, 10:21 p.m.
Posts: 34067
Joined: Nov. 19, 2002

What was rent 25 years ago for a townhouse? Is it the same today? Because the mortgage payment is the same.

It is easy to dodge our responsibilities, but we cannot dodge the consequences of dodging our responsibilities.
- Josiah Stamp

Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race.
- H.G. Wells

March 10, 2014, 10:35 p.m.
Posts: 7707
Joined: Sept. 11, 2003

What was rent 25 years ago for a townhouse? Is it the same today? Because the mortgage payment is the same.

According to this

http://vancouverpeak.com/showthread.php?tid=597

Condo ~ 100% rent increase over 25 years
Detached home ~ 200% - 300%

Interest rates have been dirt cheap for the last 15 years, seems to be likely for the forseeable future, but a lot of people lost their homes in the early 80s because of sky-high interest rates …

Forum jump: