Been trying to make sense of the new geo changes with 27.5 to 29 differences and steep seat angles.
I've been mostly riding a new short travel 29er last couple of months mixed in with rides on my long travel 27.5. Both 460mm reach, 29er with a steeper seat angle.
Just pedalled around today on Sights in M 29, L 29, L 27.5. 455mm reach M and 485mm reach L's.
L Sight 29 at 485mm was far too vast, standover too tall, stack too tall, and just ungainly. Interestingly at identical reach L Sight 27.5 felt pretty close to ideal, maybe 5mm too long, but low maneuverable and confident. Also surprising was that the M Sight 29 also felt close to ideal. If purchasing a new Sight I'd probably have to think hard about what type of trails it would see to decide between a M 29 and L 27.5.
Also spent a couple of days this week riding a L Devinci Spartan 29 with 465mm reach. After a previous day on a Hightower, (brilliant bikes both), I'm convinced that 27.5 is the way to go for long travel on low speed technical trails.
Interesting findings for me, previously I thought that seated and standing reach numbers we're all I needed to translate across to a new bike.
Last edited by: Hepcat on Dec. 30, 2019, 7:03 p.m., edited 2 times in total.