@craig and cunningstunts:I've just read your posts, after typing my monster post, didn't reload the page before. I totally agree with what you say. A Tallboy LTC is the best candidate as my next bike. I don't think a travel adjust fork is necessary though. I've always had them on my 26ers, but my 29er climbs worlds better than them, with the fork at full height…
Took another ride on my 2011 Stumpjumper FSR 29er today. This thing is just a really fun ride.
I am astonished every time how fast and efficient it rolls. Yet when I drop into a steep muddy or sandy line, it still just grips. And that's with some pinner tires with comparably high pressure.
After reading all the fuss with short chainstays and all the moaning because of the new Enduro 29. I really have to say that I think it doesn't matter all that much.
My FSR has around 450mm stays and it is an XL. It is true, the front wheel takes some muscle to lift. But it is manageable and it climbs like crazy. Drops are easy. If there's a hindrance to throwing that bike around it is the lousy mid stroke support of the frankenbiked RP23 or the linkage curve on this particular design.
For my taste it is too linear and really blows through mid stroke.
A shock revalve (it's a boost valve shock, they seem to be notorious for this stuff) might solve that issue though,
For really thight stuff the 125mm travel of my REVERB are not enough. I'd love a 150mm post.
Complaining about tiny niggles. Which leads me to believe, my bike is pretty dialed right now,
Just for shits and giggles I took some 2013 bikes for a spin at the LBS I used to work. 29er carbon hardtail with 430mm stays. (Like the Enduro)
Stumpjumper evo with 26" and 420mm stays. And a couple of AM 26ers.
I entertained the thought to change back to 26" for flickability and more fun on the trail. Mostly because of reading too much mtbr and bike magazines through winter, when I was snowed in and only able to ride my rigid beater commuting bike.
In reality, the 29ers felt a lot better to me. Lifting the front wheel on a 430mm 29er is still harder than on the 26ers, but its doable. The difference to my 450mm bike is there. But it's not night and day. Either you can wheelie, manual and hop. Or you can't.
It's nuts. At my size 6ft, 93cm inseam and long arms, the fit a 29er, even a racing HT, gives me because of bar height feels just more natural.
In the past I've ridden medium and large 26ers. My 2003 Heckler felt incredibly flickable and fun on certain trails. At the same time it wandered a lot through climbs, didn't roll good with proper tires and made my back ache on long climbs. Still love that rig, for all the good times I got out of it.
Riding the 26ers now, after riding a 29er, they just feel really strange. I am sure, I'd get used to them again. Especially if they'd be long travel, slack. But in the 140mm travel range they just don't make much sense for tall people (IMHO) .
What really awes me with the 29ers is the extended rang you get. Want to take a long gravel, pave epic ride. Climb endless mountains, spend a day at the lifts. Do it.
Of course there are better niche bikes (park especially), but the versatility is most of the fun in biking for me.
In August I'll be on a Specialized Camp, riding the enduros 29+26 and the Stumpjumper evos in both wheel sizes extensively in the Alps, also I'll head over to Italy, to test a Santa Cruz Tallboy LTC. Really curious what will feel best…
Greetings Znarf