Actually the above post is lame. I'd love to understand why people post useless comments like this on a thread. Sorry to have reacted but threads get cluttered with these comments and it's tiring to read and scroll past to find the people who have something useful to contribute.
Thank you Kayaker… not sure why some people feel the need to publicly insult other people or companies. We're seven guys within Brodie, we do the best we can.
I agree, the future will be interesting knowing all those answers, but you're right a lot of people who do ride them rave about them. I think it has a good potential to replace cross country bikes eventually.. but that's just my personal opinion haha. Funny enough our product manager always says you can't teach an old dog new tricks; but once he tried the 29'er, he seems to love it so far.
As for being bandwagon jumpers, it's not a fact of jumping on a bandwagon, it's us waiting til we had the product right before we jump onto it. We all knew it was coming and the likely hood of it sticking to be a part of bicycle history, but until we got the geometry, strength etc. we didn't want to wing it. To make it ride properly (how we wanted) you need the right fork offset, we wanted short chain stays and a fork that wasn't just a 26" fork that could fit a 29'er wheel… it had to have the right geometry.
Anyway, the reason for the shaped downtube is so the fork controls would have clearance. Without a bend to the downtube, the tube would have to be welded higher on the headtube which isn't as strong as if you had it lower on the headtube.