Posted by: RAHrider
I agree that weight doesn't impact climbing as much as people believe. I was suggesting the weight would effect other aspects of the ride. He is coming from a 27.5 bike with older geometry. On his existing bike the wheels are far lighter, have less centripetal forces and a shorter wheel base on a lighter bike. I was just thinking that trying to keep a few of those variables in check would make for an easier transition to a longer and heavier bike.
For myself, the difference between my 27.5 hardtail and my 29er is quite stark in terms of the loss of quickness in handling and manoeuvrability and they both have similar geometry. I avoid super long and heavy 29ers as they lose the part of the the ride I like best. If he is looking to go straight fast, the chicoten may be a great bike but if he likes the fun factor of his warden a heavier long travel long wheelbase 29er bike may not be as good as a slightly lighter, slightly shorter one.
Thanks everyone for your opinion. Indeed, RAH, that's exactly where I am right now.
I was hoping to gain a little bit on all aspects of my ride ! Am I asking too much ? lol !
Initially, I wanted to switch to chilcotin, because of my very positive experience with knolly.
And then I read, heard, watched some reviews of people mentioning it was all about going straight fast ! So I started to wonder, if maybe, there could be a better option ...
Those reviewers also mention : "If I was living on the North shore, things would be different ..." ; so it might actually still be my best bet ... Spoiled kid dilemma !
Well, it looks like I can't go really wrong with any of these three bikes. I take note that weigh is a less important factor than geometry, and a good old try out will be the best way to find out.
Anyone would come ride with me and switch bike for couple of miles ? I provide after ride beer.