New posts

NSMB - 2014 – Hardtail Thread

Feb. 2, 2014, 8:59 p.m.
Posts: 1027
Joined: June 26, 2012

nice. i hear the tagline for those is: all the fun of a honzo, at half the weight ;)

According to mtbr, the Taro frame is around 4 lbs whereas the Honzo is over 6 lbs. But the stock build on the Taro is quite heavy, coming in around 30 lbs, similar to a complete Honzo.

Feb. 2, 2014, 9:03 p.m.
Posts: 7566
Joined: March 7, 2004

nice. i hear the tagline for those is: all the fun of a honzo, at half the weight ;)

but it's aluminum

Feb. 2, 2014, 9:17 p.m.
Posts: 1027
Joined: June 26, 2012

but it's aluminum

I find it interesting that steel costs a premium and aluminum comes on cheaper models. That is quite the contrast to the situation 10-15 years ago, where aluminum was only found on higher end models.

Feb. 2, 2014, 9:22 p.m.
Posts: 15019
Joined: April 5, 2007

With steel the feel is real, man.:smokey:

Why slag free swag?:rolleyes:

ummm, as your doctor i recommend against riding with a scaphoid fracture.

Feb. 2, 2014, 9:32 p.m.
Posts: 5740
Joined: May 28, 2005

With steel the feel is real, man.:smokey:

but it's aluminum

i'm a steel hardtail guy m'self, but i'd love to try one of these new school alu 29" hardtails (taro, paradox, yelli, etc.). burly steel hardtail frames, like the stylus or transam - there's really not much of that steel "give" or "twang" to them - they're bloody stiff, in both good and bad ways. and they're not light. i'm curious how much stiffer an aluminum frame would be, considering how much weight you can shave off a given build

"Nobody really gives a shit that you don't like the thing that you have no firsthand experience with." Dave

Feb. 3, 2014, 5:17 p.m.
Posts: 0
Joined: Aug. 12, 2007

Tungsten, the BB height with the Nobby Nics dragged out of the recycling bin at work is a gnats cock over 12", so not too jacked up. Riding down from way above 7th Switchback on Fromme and into the Crinkum Crankum stuff at 5th showed that the bike feels really nice (if you accept it's limitations…), but the $2.50 V brake pad inserts are not exactly up to the job!

treezz
wow you are a ass

Feb. 3, 2014, 6:16 p.m.
Posts: 2045
Joined: Jan. 5, 2010

i'm a steel hardtail guy m'self, but i'd love to try one of these new school alu 29" hardtails (taro, paradox, yelli, etc.). burly steel hardtail frames, like the stylus or transam - there's really not much of that steel "give" or "twang" to them - they're bloody stiff, in both good and bad ways. and they're not light. i'm curious how much stiffer an aluminum frame would be, considering how much weight you can shave off a given build

I'm also curious about this. Went with a steel mtb hardtail as recommended by everyone, but got an alu cross bike to save cost and weight. The little bit of off road I've done on the fully rigid alu bike leads me to believe an alu mtb hardtail wouldn't be too horrible.
I have no desire to swap out hardtail frames though, so it may be a long long time before I experiment.

Feb. 3, 2014, 10:34 p.m.
Posts: 4295
Joined: June 24, 2010

As you can see in this thread, I've been between a number of steel and aluminum hardtails over the past few years, plus a few test bikes that aren't on that list. Aluminum always feels stiff and jerky, while steel can be forgiving (but can also be overbuilt). Riding my Rootdown (429 RC) and a Honzo (414 RC) back to back was a bit of an eye opener – the Chromag rides way smoother. If you're riding in BC, you don't want an aluminum hardtail in my opinion.

flickr

Feb. 3, 2014, 11:40 p.m.
Posts: 3834
Joined: May 23, 2006

IMO aluminium only good for full sus.

Freedom of contract. We sell them guns that kill them; they sell us drugs that kill us.

Feb. 3, 2014, 11:47 p.m.
Posts: 5740
Joined: May 28, 2005

IMO aluminium only good for full sus.

And recycling!

"Nobody really gives a shit that you don't like the thing that you have no firsthand experience with." Dave

Feb. 4, 2014, 12:11 a.m.
Posts: 643
Joined: March 25, 2011

As you can see in this thread, I've been between a number of steel and aluminum hardtails over the past few years, plus a few test bikes that aren't on that list. Aluminum always feels stiff and jerky, while steel can be forgiving (but can also be overbuilt). Riding my Rootdown (429 RC) and a Honzo (414 RC) back to back was a bit of an eye opener – the Chromag rides way smoother. If you're riding in BC, you don't want an aluminum hardtail in my opinion.

Yup, my chainstays were jammed all the way forward. I'm going to move them back and see if it changes the feel. Nevertheless, the Honzo is overbuilt and is very stiff. I'm honestly not sure if the compliant steel feel is actually felt in the Honzo. I think that if my Hardtail was something I rode more than just occasionally, I'd be looking for a frame with a bit longer RC and a bit more give ie the Rootdown, Surface, Sir 9 (especially for SS) etc…

Feb. 4, 2014, 10:36 a.m.
Posts: 26382
Joined: Aug. 14, 2005

IMO aluminium only good for holding beer

FYP

www.thisiswhy.co.uk

www.teamnfi.blogspot.com/

Feb. 4, 2014, 11:01 a.m.
Posts: 4740
Joined: Nov. 20, 2002

As you can see in this thread, I've been between a number of steel and aluminum hardtails over the past few years, plus a few test bikes that aren't on that list. Aluminum always feels stiff and jerky, while steel can be forgiving (but can also be overbuilt). Riding my Rootdown (429 RC) and a Honzo (414 RC) back to back was a bit of an eye opener – the Chromag rides way smoother. If you're riding in BC, you don't want an aluminum hardtail in my opinion.

What about carbon?

Feb. 4, 2014, 11:13 a.m.
Posts: 5740
Joined: May 28, 2005

What about carbon?

are there any aggressive carbon hardtails? the on one 456c is the only non-xc one that springs to mind. i've never ridden one but all the reviews said it was a hella harsh ride

"Nobody really gives a shit that you don't like the thing that you have no firsthand experience with." Dave

Feb. 4, 2014, 11:34 a.m.
Posts: 19031
Joined: Oct. 28, 2003

With steel the feel is real, man.:smokey:

Go Ti and you'll fly.

Forum jump: