Posted by: XXX_er
Yes I understand, it is easier/preferable to be too lazy to read a few posts than admit you were wrong but then your posts are so often rambling or incoherent
I give zero fucks why a bike store might refuse service, I think money is the same color no matter who gives it to you, but it did happen
Posted by: XXX_er
obviously those shops had enough business or were pissed or sft, I don't know/don't care
the point would be buddy was refused service a few ( 3 times, maybe he was wearing a MAGA ball cap ? ) so while you snow flakes are all "ooooh it shouldnt happen" I be pontificating on the fact this is what actualy did happen and the possible thot process behind it for a shop owner who has his ass on line when a million+ inventory is sitting in the showroom,
So when you do the internet bike thing and it goes sideways own it instead of whining like a little girl that wants to have her cake and eat it too
lol - that's choice on the first post. Maybe instead of getting upset when a number of people are questioning your posting style/coherency you could put a little more effort into what you're trying to say?
Re the second part, if a shop owner has money tied up in inventory wouldn't it be a smart move to take the business of a new customer ready to pay for service to create cashflow? There's a good chance that customer may return and spend even more money based on getting good customer service. It's an opportunity, why turn it away? You say you don't care why a shop would refuse service and that it shouldn't matter to a shop where the cash comes from but then proceed to flame people who find it strange that a shop wouldn't take that cash and that it's somehow their own fault for getting an internet bike. Your line of thinking is a bit contradictory. Or maybe you are so focused on only one part of the issue that you're failing to see the bigger picture? To be honest I really can't tell, but apparently that's an issue with my reading comprehension and not your writing style/
For the most part the discussion on the last few pages seems to be revolving around whether shops should be refusing service to someone with an internet bike (and parts) and whether that's in the best interests of the shop who does, right? For someone who supposedly doesn't care, you sure seem to making the effort to be tell those who do care about the issue to fuck off.