He mentioned a whopping seven items, and also mentioned several drawbacks to those items. Frankly, that's quality journalism compared to the industry knob-slobbery that passes for "Gear Shots" on the NSMB front page.
Wow. That's a little harsh - but I guess Pete went a little overboard as well. If you think Gear Shots is 'industry knob-slobbery' I'd like to have some examples. Particularly because I have no idea what 'industry knob-slobbery' means.
I assume you are aware that Gear Shots isn't meant to be a review - nor do we try to disguise it as such. It's what we say about items we have just received. Essentially the goal is to give you an idea of what the manufacturer is trying to accomplish, what we can notice out of the box - and that's about it. You can compare it to bike mag's Fresh Produce - virtually every print mag has a section like that. There is probably a name for it - something like 'product intro' but I'm just guessing.
If 'industry knob-slobbery' is a knock at our integrity I assure you we have no motivation to cover up problems or exagerate positives. We do our very best to tell it like it is. We're not perfect, nor are we saints, but we tell the truth as we see it.
Some print mags write reviews without riding bikes, sell the front page to the highest bidder, and often they will print marketing material as submitted and pass it off as a review. This disgusts me - and I was very surprised and disappointed to find out that it happens.
We don't do that.
Sincerely,
Industry Knob