that's hilarious that you think people use their real names only for self promotion.
i thought blunt's point about the real-name handles was a good one
Seems to me that most of the people with their REAL names have something to gain in the MTB world by having their name out there. Especially the ones calling people out. The Air Apprentice, the MTB author etc.
i also thought his point was made quite fairly and respectfully: he didn't use it to try to vilify the real-namers/tom's friends for having his back
So circle the wagons around your friend, or friends son, I'm fine with that. I'm sure the young man can use some support and it's always a good thing to get out and ride.
sebkemp, stephenmatthews, sharon - all industry folks who have something to gain from establishing and maintaining a public profile (welcome, btw, stephen, seb and paul - i think there are a lot of folks here who are pretty psyched that you're adding your voices to the conversations on this forum)
I've often thought about switching mine to my real name, but mostly because it forces one to be more accountable for the things they say.
we all know who you are flip, and i don't think its a stretch to say that your contributions to this site and mtb in whistler are appreciated by everyone on this forum :) my impression is that you also make a point of supporting whistler riders/builders/etc. in your posts all over the interweb - and at root i'm guessing that what stevens and stephenmatthews are doing here, too. loyalty is a commendable attribute, and i imagine the amount of time you guys spend pumping up each others' tires both contributes to and is a product of how tight the riding community in whistler is
but there's a not-so-fine line between defending your friend and taking the piss about a pretty crappy thing that happened to our home:
Listen vancouver, the only people that are tarnishing your image are the people that won't let the riots go. I think I speak for the rest of the world when I say that nobody gives a shit, we forgot about it a long time ago.
I agree with you 100% that "the only people that are tarnishing (your) image are the people that won't let the riots go"
that's obnoxious. if someone(s) came up and trashed your home, the degree of whistlerhomerism you are displaying suggests you'd be pretty upset. but regardless, people who live in vancouver were really upset by the riot, and they're not happy about being reminded about it or someone who took part and hasn't even attempted to make symbolic reparations to the city he helped to tarnish. whether you appreciate them or not, those are real emotions and making light of them is disrespectful
I'm pretty sure that same book has some interesting advice for women boldly speaking out in public too, so it really doesn't hold much weight in my house.
quoted for awesomeness. blunt, that might just be my favorite post of the year
"Nobody really gives a shit that you don't like the thing that you have no firsthand experience with." Dave