Posted by: fartymarty
A little off topic but https://m.pinkbike.com/news/opinion-are-we-trying-to-make-mountain-biking-better-or-easier.html isn't too bad a read from Mr Quinney.
Nice read for sure, a bit of a fresh perspective from over there in my opinion.
I think this might be a good topic for a Meatengines post or even a summary of the min-max series, but after looking at these older rigs that are being upgraded to compete with today (or at least be ridden today), it would be nice to think about what all of these changes over the years have really brought to MTB. Are we developing bikes to make riding easier? better? harder? allowing some to push the limits and the rest to access trails we couldn't ride 5 years ago? Wheel size, geometry numbers, suspension linkage...
Surely there is a line, maybe it is similar for most, but I wouldn't ride a bike that dates past a certain year unless I'd lost a bet. But is there a year that we can say, yeah, anything built after this year is decently approaching the limit of how good bikes can really be? or will the sport always evolve so much that you won't want to ride something more than 15 years old?