Posted by: AndrewMajor
Posted by: Vikb
Posted by: AndrewMajor
They have a bunch of ~ bike parts so they’re basically mountain bicycles right?
Ya. I mean they are only wrist-assist. They don't move without a human turning a bike part.
The important thing to remember, Vik, is that it's all about education and courtesy. There were jerks riding muscle bikes long before electric motors were introduced to the equation, and there were jerks riding Class-1 BroPeds long before the mini-e-motos started showing up. Trail organizations just need to get on signage right away. Folks will definitely obey clear directional signage just like they currently follow clear signage denoting where e-MTBs are not welcome. Folks will absolutely slow down and yield the trails to other users, just like they do now.
Okay, yes, in the wrong hands, these more powerful pedal-free mountain bicycles could be an issue - faster speeds, more user interactions per hour - but the horse is already out of the barn so instead of whining about it and being an elitist gate-keeper get busy adapting how you use rider-built trail infrastructure to accommodate this new branch of mountain bicycling.
The concerning thing no one ever talks about is the potential fuel for those who Sierra Club types who want bikes banned from the woods. I am old enough to remember the late 1980's when groups like the Sierra Club used Snake Oil level science to get mtb's banned from or tried to from the woods. One their big talking points was...." It has a chain and cogs therefore it is motorized and must be banned". Reality this thinking has been ingrained in various staffers in the various land management agencies for decades. There are still those types out there. And with the current regression of people's mindsets where in certain areas things when it comes to access are going backwards. It should not be considered a possibility this whole argument could return and with the internet much worse.
I have seen an area that till 3-4 years ago was great for meat engine mtb's be lost because the land manager who took over from the preceding one is anti bike.