#!markdown
A side note that the sanctioning process happened due in large part to efforts
of the NSMBA in the ARGG process.under the auspices of SharonB and MatthewB in
particular.
Unsanctioned building is at best a civil wrong (RE lawyers can come up with
the analysis - I think it would be based on trespass). Knocking the structures
down is also at best, a civil wrong. Accordingly your statement " the building
of unsanctioned mountain biking structures was just as "wrong" as the folks
knocking those structures down is IMO correct.
Sabotaging trails with the intent to injure however crosses the boundary into
a criminal action. That is the distinction that should be drawn and one that
Slyfink and yourself are not following.
Feb. 11, 2015, 11:45 a.m. - Lee Lau
#!markdown A side note that the sanctioning process happened due in large part to efforts of the NSMBA in the ARGG process.under the auspices of SharonB and MatthewB in particular. Unsanctioned building is at best a civil wrong (RE lawyers can come up with the analysis - I think it would be based on trespass). Knocking the structures down is also at best, a civil wrong. Accordingly your statement " the building of unsanctioned mountain biking structures was just as "wrong" as the folks knocking those structures down is IMO correct. Sabotaging trails with the intent to injure however crosses the boundary into a criminal action. That is the distinction that should be drawn and one that Slyfink and yourself are not following.