Reply to comment


Feb. 25, 2015, 2:18 p.m. -  Tom

#!markdown I think you need to think about the individual in two ways rather than label them as one athlete/model. Judge them on how good they are as an athlete if that's what they claim they are. Then on their popularity as a model. I think the average person with a bit of common sense will be able to brake it down like this and decide why that individual is marketing a product. That is the key thing about social marketing, it's for the consumer to decide if what is being advertised fits into their lifestyle and if they want to be a part of it. We don't have to be exposed to it if we don't want to. If you are looking at the modle side of it and a female is getting a lot of attention due to her looks and athletic body, that can only be a plus. Good looking female models are role models for a lot of people and if a model can become popular due to there chosen sport surely that is a better than some fake reality female model? I think if a female athlete is really that good then there skill will shine through before anything else. Let's be honest if you are not constantly in the top 5 in a female DH World Cup race. You are going to struggle to get any proper financial support even if you are just out of that top 5. I would imagine the leval of sponsorship would be comparable to a male WC racer that finishes in the 40/60's. So if you are a female rider and can use abit of extra charm to do what you love why not. Let's face it some people are just more popular than others.

Post your comment

Please log in to leave a comment.