Reply to comment


April 20, 2015, 10:19 p.m. -  Tanker Overflow

#!markdown " You seemed to accept the company's answers without counter attacking. It's ok if you want to showcase the company's PR. It's not ok if you're trying to demonstrate hard hitting journalism." It's just bros hangin' with their bros, while gettin' some ducats out of it. We're supposed to envy them as "insiders." It's pretty pathetic. "Oh Vernon, you're so cool you even get to ask them questions which you'll later describe to your audience as tough ones. How privileged and lucky you are. Livin' the dream." It's not even journalism, let alone hard-hitting inquiry or critical examination. It's fluff. But that's what Bike Mag has been since it began. Selling the image of livin' the dream. Why should we expect them to dig deep and turn on the inquisitor's bright spotlight?

Post your comment

Please log in to leave a comment.