Upload your photos
Forgot your password?
So…if I understand this correctly, the benefits of a 27/29+ bike which were
outlined could be obtained by, well, becoming a better rider? So, in short,
better cornering technique and skills practice could give you every benefit
you would get from a brand new, pointless, 5K steed? And how does the
unskilled rider that, supposedly, these individuals are targeting handle the
obvious penalties of a fatter, heavier tire? At what point does innovation
become a handicap? At what point do we solve issues with skill with
technology? I love many of the progressive ideas and technologies emerging
today (to see this much creativity in the bike industry is awesome), but, I
really don't see the need for a different bike for every single thing -
especially something so minor. Wouldn't energy be better spent looking at
exciting suspension/frame designs or ways to get technology onto bikes for
less $$? Why don't you listen to your consumers? You aren't Apple. We know
what bikes we like; we know how bikes are made; we know the geometry and the
numbers better than you might. We're creative - playing and tinkering in our
garages, wondering what if…We know what we want. Try giving it to us - as
opposed to distracting the market with another gimmick. Your consumers aren't
saying "innovate" - they are saying "get smarter with those innovations; make
them more affordable." Try listening. And you know what happens when we stop
talking? We stop giving you money.
Please log in to leave a comment.