#!markdown
I agree with you completely simpleton. But tibor didn't actually disagree with
anything. He took potshots, made vague references to some of my points, called
me a liar (because he read the title of my piece but not the piece itself and
never owned up to that) and was simply a contrarian. I actually don't think we
disagreed about much - he was just picking fights with everyone. We also
received more messages, emails and comments from people asking us to remove
him than we have ever had. Even more than we did with Mike Vandeman so there
should be some sort of Mike V award bestowed on him.
These are the only two times this has happened. If he was actually taking us
to task for specifics I would have been happy to address them. Instead he used
insults and condescension as his weapons and picked fights with every person
he engaged. Please tell me one of his 'great articulate points' because I
would actually be interested in hearing that. They weren't in any of the
points that were deleted for violating our TOS so they should all be here.
I'm not sure why you are hiding behind a pseudonym as well. Why is that?
Anyway - fire away with his great points because every other comment we have
heard is that he added nothing.
We have no problem with being disagreed with. I welcome that in fact. I have
thought about this stuff and it is based on my actual experience and opinions
so right or wrong I can back up my arguments. Insults and baseless accusations
sprinkled with pseudo-academic posing aren't as welcome.
April 23, 2015, 11:49 a.m. - Cam McRae
#!markdown I agree with you completely simpleton. But tibor didn't actually disagree with anything. He took potshots, made vague references to some of my points, called me a liar (because he read the title of my piece but not the piece itself and never owned up to that) and was simply a contrarian. I actually don't think we disagreed about much - he was just picking fights with everyone. We also received more messages, emails and comments from people asking us to remove him than we have ever had. Even more than we did with Mike Vandeman so there should be some sort of Mike V award bestowed on him. These are the only two times this has happened. If he was actually taking us to task for specifics I would have been happy to address them. Instead he used insults and condescension as his weapons and picked fights with every person he engaged. Please tell me one of his 'great articulate points' because I would actually be interested in hearing that. They weren't in any of the points that were deleted for violating our TOS so they should all be here. I'm not sure why you are hiding behind a pseudonym as well. Why is that? Anyway - fire away with his great points because every other comment we have heard is that he added nothing. We have no problem with being disagreed with. I welcome that in fact. I have thought about this stuff and it is based on my actual experience and opinions so right or wrong I can back up my arguments. Insults and baseless accusations sprinkled with pseudo-academic posing aren't as welcome.