Sorry! I missed this. I like the way the 170 climbs but I'm not that fussy. The 152 however is a rocket in comparison. I also thought about putting a longer fork on the 152 but that wouldn't change the kinematics of the rear suspension, which is what is really the limiting factor for downhill partying in my view.
If the trails aren't too rough where you are, get the 152. If they are get the 170 I'd say.
Jan. 10, 2023, 9:39 p.m. - Cam McRae
Sorry! I missed this. I like the way the 170 climbs but I'm not that fussy. The 152 however is a rocket in comparison. I also thought about putting a longer fork on the 152 but that wouldn't change the kinematics of the rear suspension, which is what is really the limiting factor for downhill partying in my view. If the trails aren't too rough where you are, get the 152. If they are get the 170 I'd say.