Upload your photos
Forgot your password?
For the SCOR I cannot see a reason why they couldn't adjust the frame to fit a longer dropper at max depth.
Compromises can be fine. I ride an aluminum bike with external rear brake routing. Cheaper and effective but a compromise of aesthetics.
What did SCOR have to say in regards to why they could not accommodate a full length dropper or make the cable routing easier? I think bike companies, their designers and product managers, should be 100% transparent if asked these simple questions.
I am glad you brought up WR1. Dustin Adams is NOT happy with the cable routing as he has stated in media interviews. He also made a conscious choice in not having tube in tube and was very open about his design considerations. So did he make a design faux pas in my books? Yes. However he was completely honest and transparent about both these things which lends him credence towards an improved second design attempt.
Again, maybe I am jaded but the bike industry keeps trying to sell lipstick dolled up pigs and I am no longer the wide eyed naive buyer I used to be. AKA, don't spite on my cupcake and call it frosting.
Dustin, I am rooting for you.
\- full dropper post insertion to max depth
\- no more exposed cable routing under the BB (FFS please)
\- some sort of foam sleeve solution if no immediate plans for tube in tube?
Please log in to leave a comment.