They're a decent tire. Much better as a rear than a front. I'd sooner pick these than any 2.6" on the planet, because even though the knobs are small and widely spaced I can eke out traction with body english and lean angle, or drift and deal. But you cannot fake nor make up for a lack of air volume. These have a lot more air volume than 2.6".
Alas, they lack the air volume of all 3.0's and some other 2.8's, so I still gravitate to 3.0's.
I sell a metric tonne of 2.8" Rekon's to people whom have been on 2.6" for a bit and are plus curious. Gateway drug and all that.
March 11, 2022, 6:43 a.m. - mikesee
They're a decent tire. Much better as a rear than a front. I'd sooner pick these than any 2.6" on the planet, because even though the knobs are small and widely spaced I can eke out traction with body english and lean angle, or drift and deal. But you cannot fake nor make up for a lack of air volume. These have a lot more air volume than 2.6". Alas, they lack the air volume of all 3.0's and some other 2.8's, so I still gravitate to 3.0's. I sell a metric tonne of 2.8" Rekon's to people whom have been on 2.6" for a bit and are plus curious. Gateway drug and all that.