But pretty much every MFG is reporting 100%, so if you want to compare apples to apples you should use that. I get the merits of reporting after sag, but recognize that it is not the common usage so you should specify, e,g, "only 12% progression, post-sag."
For the record, the charts on their site show -(2.34/3.02)+1 = 22.5% for small/medium frames, and a little less on the big frames, so I'm assuming their claims are correct and you can examine the full curve there if you'd like. By my eyeballs, their 30% to 95% progression is -(2.36/2.78)+1=15%
Feb. 18, 2022, 11:14 a.m. - Marc Fenigstein
But pretty much every MFG is reporting 100%, so if you want to compare apples to apples you should use that. I get the merits of reporting after sag, but recognize that it is not the common usage so you should specify, e,g, "only 12% progression, post-sag." For the record, the charts on their site show -(2.34/3.02)+1 = 22.5% for small/medium frames, and a little less on the big frames, so I'm assuming their claims are correct and you can examine the full curve there if you'd like. By my eyeballs, their 30% to 95% progression is -(2.36/2.78)+1=15%