Reply to comment


Oct. 14, 2015, 8:15 a.m. -  OnedayIwilllogin

#!markdown I have a hard time seeing how they measured and considered rider input in this. It's easy to simplify the problem and consider McGazza as a simple projectile (that would have worked for calculating his trajectory in his latest stairset adventure). Those numbers about speed resulting in under or overshoot are pretty much crap since they don't take into account what the rider did (pop or swallow the lip). But hey, mountain bikers love cheap physics so why not!

Post your comment

Please log in to leave a comment.