Reply to comment


April 3, 2019, 7:42 a.m. -  Andrew Major

I ran 29” front / 27” rear for a couple years on the bike I muled parts on for NSMB. Any photo of my Ti Explosif in articles had this setup. ![](https://nsmb.com/media/original_images/Formula-ROR-NSMB-AndrewM-1.jpgw1600) ![](https://nsmb.com/media/images/Explosif_29_27.original.jpg) I ran it with three different suspension forks to play with offset (44/51/55) as well as a custom rigid fork. 100mm travel (or corrected) with a 29” wheel front. I’ve also spent hours on a Cannondale Jekyll with a 29” setup up front with good results (140mm fork + 29” setup instead of usual 160mm + 27” setup). Originally I tried it just to get some hours on a 29" Trace 34 that weren't on my hardtail but it was my favourite way I rode the Jekyll. ![](https://nsmb.com/media/original_images/AMajor_XFusion_NSMB_KazYamamura-12.jpgresize16002C1067) I’ve tried the setup with other bikes (29'ers) but the big issue vs Angleset for me is how much slacker the STA gets. This is much easier to compensate for on a 27” bike when going 29" up front - as we’re seeing with Maes etc - than it is through installing a 27" wheel on the back of a 29" bike. This is even true to some extent going 29" to 27+. As with most things folks just look at static geo - where 27+ is close enough to a 29" standard setup - but the sag on a Plus tire can make a notable difference compared to a regular tire. Hence why most 29/27+ bikes either have too low of a BB with 27+ or too high of a BB with 29". I’m fully an advocate of folks trying stuff for themselves - have at it - but I'll also note, word to the wise here, like any hot trend there are a bunch of cons vs just running a dual 29” - especially on hardtails. There are reasons my Walt is 29+/29 and my next bike will be 29/29 as well.

Post your comment

Please log in to leave a comment.