Reply to comment


June 6, 2016, 7:53 a.m. -  Cam McRae

#!markdown That was as measured Gade. Unloaded obviously and static geo numbers are only good for so much. For the most part this was never an issue for me - and recall that the bike wasn't designed around a 150mm fork. With a 140mm fork the high position measures 359 and the low is 350 (Trek's numbers). Would I like to see the bike get lower in the future, and be designed around a 150mm fork? I would. There are likely some bikes on the horizon from Trek so perhaps one of them would move the bb in the direction you and I would like to see. I'd recommend riding the bike to see what you think either way. Cheers!

Post your comment

Please log in to leave a comment.