Sure. I'd just be MUCH more annoyed if a new shell was involved. Its also fun to point out that crank/BB interface standards are numerous already.
People seem to be acting like the current state of affairs is a nicely unified standard interface, when that is far from accurate.
Overall, it seems like a pragmatic solution. BB shells aren't going to standardize anytime soon, so SRAM is making a system that works well with all of the most common ones.
Jan. 16, 2018, 2:19 p.m. - mobaar
Sure. I'd just be MUCH more annoyed if a new shell was involved. Its also fun to point out that crank/BB interface standards are numerous already. People seem to be acting like the current state of affairs is a nicely unified standard interface, when that is far from accurate. Overall, it seems like a pragmatic solution. BB shells aren't going to standardize anytime soon, so SRAM is making a system that works well with all of the most common ones.