@jeffgicklhorn: I totally agree that they need to come up with something different... although it is a shared damper architecture they use, so not technically disingenuous.
Considering that it's SRAM, I don't know why they haven't just added some alphanumeric designations at the end to simplify it [and do the same with the Charger setups], which would a) denote the actual type and parts used, b) convey a key figure of merit or dimension, such as stanchion size, and c) look more technical and awesome to anybody who encounters them.
June 6, 2017, 1:30 p.m. - Tehllama42
@jeffgicklhorn: I totally agree that they need to come up with something different... although it is a shared damper architecture they use, so not technically disingenuous. Considering that it's SRAM, I don't know why they haven't just added some alphanumeric designations at the end to simplify it [and do the same with the Charger setups], which would a) denote the actual type and parts used, b) convey a key figure of merit or dimension, such as stanchion size, and c) look more technical and awesome to anybody who encounters them.