Reply to comment


Oct. 21, 2016, 9:11 a.m. -  KWL

#!markdown I happened to be up there when two men were putting up one of the signs a few weeks back. He suggested (bear in mind this is a rough quote) that the CMHC was doing this to cover themselves, especially in relation to built structures, and that nothing would really change in terms of access. He also said that the CMHC no longer wanted to be an absentee landlord. I find that hard to believe though.

Post your comment

Please log in to leave a comment.