Reply to comment

March 4, 2013, 2:06 p.m. -  stephenmatthews

#!markdown That was definitely a poor choice of words on my part, so my apologies. It should have read "…see/read a review from a reputable rider who can point out both the positives and negatives". Although their was potential for him to have a biased view from past endorsement, it seems he's put that a side and put in an honest effort. I sometimes find that reviewers tend to leave out the things they didn't like about the bike, which Connor obviously chose to include.

Post your comment

Please log in to leave a comment.