#!markdown
Maybe it's an aesthetically-driven opinion, with which some engineers (such as
Joe G) disagree, but I feel like post mount is a cleaner, simpler solution
given that all brakes are post now. The arguments against the rear post
standard are that the IS interface distributes load more evenly, and that many
people choose a rotor larger than stock and require an adapter anyway.
Jan. 17, 2014, 1:36 p.m. - morgman
#!markdown Maybe it's an aesthetically-driven opinion, with which some engineers (such as Joe G) disagree, but I feel like post mount is a cleaner, simpler solution given that all brakes are post now. The arguments against the rear post standard are that the IS interface distributes load more evenly, and that many people choose a rotor larger than stock and require an adapter anyway.