#!markdown
No apology neccesary; I was trying to figure out what you were getting at.
I was overheard, not to mention seen, comments a la "why don't they make a 33t
or 35t narrow wide ring" and I thought you might be referencing that.
In terms of helpful information for a review on a N/W ring, next time maybe
consider posting pictures of the chainline top down (where you will see how
much better a 30t lines up with the bigger cogs you will now be using more vs.
32/24t 2x setup compared to 32t) and experimenting with C/R washers (with long
steel bolts) to find the most efficient - straightest chainline in the gears
you most frequently use - C/R position. I think a lot of riders you benefit by
moving their single ring further inboard from the stock position with little
loss of efficiency in the gears they use less regularly.
D
Oct. 10, 2014, 2:07 a.m. - DrewM
#!markdown No apology neccesary; I was trying to figure out what you were getting at. I was overheard, not to mention seen, comments a la "why don't they make a 33t or 35t narrow wide ring" and I thought you might be referencing that. In terms of helpful information for a review on a N/W ring, next time maybe consider posting pictures of the chainline top down (where you will see how much better a 30t lines up with the bigger cogs you will now be using more vs. 32/24t 2x setup compared to 32t) and experimenting with C/R washers (with long steel bolts) to find the most efficient - straightest chainline in the gears you most frequently use - C/R position. I think a lot of riders you benefit by moving their single ring further inboard from the stock position with little loss of efficiency in the gears they use less regularly. D