#!markdown
Thanks. I maybe should have been more clear: if you're riding in snow, I agree
that you could get away with less than 1,000 lumens. In the forested canopy we
ride under here on the coast (granting no moonlight), without snow to reflect
light, and often in the rain, 1000 is the minimum IMO although I'd gladly
conceded that those with better vision and/or riding on slower trails could
get away with less…
Oct. 18, 2014, 1:30 p.m. - Pete Roggeman
#!markdown Thanks. I maybe should have been more clear: if you're riding in snow, I agree that you could get away with less than 1,000 lumens. In the forested canopy we ride under here on the coast (granting no moonlight), without snow to reflect light, and often in the rain, 1000 is the minimum IMO although I'd gladly conceded that those with better vision and/or riding on slower trails could get away with less…