vittoria airliner protect ebike
Review

Vittoria Airliner Protect Inserts

Photos Cam McRae (unless noted)
Reading time

My very first bicycle, which was a hand-me-down gift from my three cousins on my sixth birthday, had non-pneumatic tires. I say had, but that's not accurate. The bike, which seems to have been made from cast off lead pipes, is still around.

The wee red, fixed wheel safety bicycle, hanging in the back of my garage, has never had a flat, and the tires, despite looking a little haggard, are still functional 52 years and four days after my dad's first push start had me pedalling away from my cheering relations. Air filled tires would have rotted years ago, and lost air long before that. In fact, those hard rubber sausages are one of the few working elements on the bike because of the rust that has consumed the running gear.

vittoria air liner protect e-bike

Cushcore Pro on the left, Vittoria Airliner Protect on the right. Cushcore is more dense and resistant to snakebite damage while the Vittorias are lighter and take up more volume.

Filling tires with air was an incredible breakthrough that revolutionized bicycles, cars and motorcycles, but they remain the bicycle's most vulnerable element. This is true for everyone from World Cup Downhill racers, to Tour de France competitors and to ordinary riders like you and I. Nothing sucks more than hearing the dreaded hiss or feeling the sickening squirm of deflation, particularly when you are on a group ride or worse, competing. This vulnerability has fuelled my interest in the seemingly simplistic pool noodles some of us put in our tires. Not only do they prevent flats and protect our rims, the best examples will allow you to finish a ride with a completely deflated tire.

vittoria airliner protect ebike

Installation was a breeze with a 2.6" tire but trickier with a 2.5". Removal followed that same pattern.

Tire inserts have come a long way. The first time mountain biking saw them, it was by accident. And most everyone missed it. Aaron Gwin flatted and crashed and his Flat Tire Defender was laid bare for all to see. Since that first manufacturer, many new brands have sprung up. Tire manufacturers have been largely absent from that list but Vittoria is an exception. The company entered the game relatively early and has been refining designs and releasing new models recently, including the promising Airliner Protect model seen here.

vittoria airliner protect ebike

I was pretty surprised to see proof of sealant working for the very first time. It came this way from Santa Cruz so I'm not sure what brand was used here.

Given the choice between the trail model and the E-Bike model, I chose the latter. This version has more volume but only weighs 145g (29er) and 135g (27), or about half the weight of Cushcore Pro. Both of these models share the teacup profile I have had the most success with in terms of puncture protection, sidewall support and run flat capability. They seemed to tick all the boxes but I've said that before, most recently about the ultimately disappointing Panzer inserts.

vittoria airliner protect ebike

I rode this section of trail several times with two flat tires. I could negotiate the corners fine but handling was imprecise and straight-line control was indistinct. This was when the Airliner Protects were installed in 2.6" tires. Photo - Deniz Merdano

Trail Time

My experience riding Airliners has been mostly positive. I haven't flatted with them installed, despite occasionally running very low pressure, they have provided good support, and they are far lighter than a conventional mountain bike tube. One element that I was uncertain about was run-flat performance. I had taken a couple of shots at that but I realized it wasn't really a fair fight. While Vittoria designates these as suitable for tires between 2.4" and 2.6" wide, they don't work particularly well at the upper end of the scale, and the Goodyear Wrangler 27x2.6" tires I was using them in are also at the upper end of even 2.6" tire width measurements.

vittoria airliner protect ebike

Flat tires. Riding out with a flat using these inserts and 2.6" tires would be fine but not optimal. That all changed when they were installed in 2.5" rubber. Photo - Deniz Merdano

Install Part Deux

Normally, a tire with good sidewall support and run flat properties pushes against the tire's sidewall so you can feel it when you give it a squeeze. With the Wranglers it was obvious there was a void of air between insert and tire that compromised these characteristics. They weren't terrible but when run flat, they felt indistinct in a straight line and quite loose cornering. It wasn't a fair fight.

I removed them from my We Are One Arrival which is running the Wranglers, and installed them in the Schwalbe radial tires on the Santa Cruz Vala I have been testing. This time around the install was trickier because of how much volume these inserts. They were a breeze to install on the Goodyears but with the Schwalbe 2.5s, which are on the small side of that measurement, I need to first inflate and and seat the tire and then remove one side. Otherwise there wasn't room for the Airliners to be pushed into place. Once the inserts were stuff in, it was tricky to get the remaining bead to stuff into the rim around all that volume but after a little encouragement and some deep breaths, everything locked into place.

vittoria airliner protect ebike

Another look at the deflated insert ridden inside the high volume Goodyear Wrangler 2.6"rear tires, where the support run flat performance was less impressive. Photo - Deniz Merdano

Running Flat

I climbed to Fromme and up most of the climbing trail with regular pressures and when I came to the first downhill, which is part way up the climber, I let out almost all of the air. I'd guess I left between four and six psi in the rear. I continued on and was surprised to notice... pretty much nothing. Sidewall support was solid, the rear tire was a little noisier but not much, and the ride feel was soft but distinct.

Once I finished the climb I knew more dramatic action was required and I let out the remaining air, rolling the tire back and forth to ensure I'd expelled as much as possible. For this section of the ride I wanted a little speed and lots of corners so Expresso was up. I didn't stop at the entrance and there was another guy who was eyeing up the start. I asked him if he wanted to go and he waved me on. "Let me know when you want to pass," I told him, considering my compromised state.

By this point the tire was a little noisier but I couldn't feel much else. Straight line performance was distinct and trustworthy and corners felt fine as well. I even rode along the skinny leading in to Expresso Smooth and dropped in with full confidence, on a flat tire. This isn't a terribly difficult move but you ride a narrow plank that's relatively high in the air before dropping in to a steep rock roll. It would not be possible if your tire was squirming. I was pretty blown away to discover this was possible.

vittoria airliner protect ebike

The install and removal of the Vittoria Airliner Protects into the 2.5" Schwalbe tires was a little trickier because they take up so much volume.

Smashing

After that I tried to squeeze a little more air out of the tire, expecting the other rider to pass me shortly. I got another wee puff out and saddled up without seeing him and carried on. As things got more bermy, I gradually put more pressure on the rear wheel and was riding remarkably close to full speed. I was clearing gaps and making precise moves, and intentionally aiming my rear wheel at rocks and obstacles, unable to hear any rim strikes or sickening clangs of contact.

Once I got to the bottom there was a section of power line with lots of square-edged rocks embedded in the hardpan. I manualled* into these with as much weight as possible on the rear tire and then went and did it again. At the end of the section there is a curb that sticks up out of the ground at the edge of the road. I manualled into that twice at speed as well, and felt nothing.

*When I say "manualled" I mean I lifted the wheel up long enough to allow all my weight to be on my rear wheel, rather than a sustained manual which is beyond my current level of expertise.

vittoria airliner protect ebike

This was the only damage that almost cleaved a piece of foam right off the insert. This was after smashing the deflated rear wheel into a curb multiple times and into all the rocks I could find on repeat.

vittoria airliner protect ebike

Most of the damage looked more like this. There were a total of 7 tears, which doesn't seem too bad considering the pounding I gave them. It lags behind recent Cushcore Pros significantly though in this regard.

My motivation for this savage bike abuse was to discover how the Airliner Protects deal with big hits. After being disappointed with the performance of the Panzers in this regard, with much less abuse, I needed to be sure they wouldn't entirely shred under pressure. After I got home I set about removing the insert for inspection. I assumed this would be an easy job and that the bead would no longer be seated. Instead it was locked in place quite securely and I battled a little with the removal.

As you can see above, there was some impact damage, almost certainly related to me abusing the rear wheel by smashing into curbs and square edged bumps as much as possible, and descending without any air pressure. Discovering no damage at all would have been great but I consider this amount reasonable considering how hard I was trying to damage the foam. The insert seems entirely usable as well, although I may apple a little adhesive to shore up the worst damage.

vittoria airliner ebike 19

Since I began riding the Protect E-Bike inserts, Vittoria has released Enduro and DH versions pictured here, using an entirely new shape. They seems identical to the eye but the DH version weighs 175/185g while the Enduro version is 125/135g, 10g less than the Protect E-Bike tested here. I'm interested to try the DH version. There is also an even lighter trail version.

Final Verdict

If your goals for inserts are flat and rim protection, light weight and run flat performance, these may be just the ticket for you. If you don't mind a little extra weight and prefer something that will last longer, Cushcore might be a better choice. Overall though I'm very impressed with these, both on the two pedal bikes and the two eMTBs I used them on. They have their limitations on high volume tires because they aren't wide enough to be in constant contact with the sidewalls, but in a 2.5 they provide an excellent ride, are nice and light, and they run flat at about 95% and should get you out of almost anywhere.

Vittoria Airliner Protect E-Bike 60 EU

Related Stories

Trending on NSMB

Comments

craw
+2 Cam McRae bushtrucker

I think we can categorize inserts as disposable or not. Disposable i.e. these or Octamousse or (to a lesser degree) Tannus Tubeless. Reusable: Cushcore Pro and Trail.

Reply

cam@nsmb.com
+2 bushtrucker BarryW

That’s a good summary with a couple of exceptions based on personal experience.

My Octamousse experience has been good in terms of durability. I’m still using the ones I was originally sent several years ago. Perhaps others have had a different experience?

I think it’s the octagonal shape that allows OM to resist bites and chips. Many others have wings that protect sidewalls while octamousse’s protection comes more from volume. I also destroyed a carbon rim running octamousse, with the absence of wings likely contributing. I hate a rock shaped like a railroad spike and crunched the bead of an older ENVE M6. It was a lethal strike to be sure and the rims had seen years of use as well. I rode out on it without problem though, with no trail side repair necessary  

I haven’t had to take any Tannus tubeless out of service either but it’s likely I haven’t used them for many long stretches. One thing I’ve discovered about them that I appreciate is that in the event of a flat you can stuff a tube inside Tannus Tubeless for a safe ride out. They aren’t great to ride flat but this (along with their weight) is a nice bonus.

Panzers are firmly in the disposable category.

Reply

BarryW
0

I've only run Tannus Tubeless and rode out 5 miles once (on very mellow trail but at a good clip and pedaling into the flat corners fairly aggressively) and the bead stayed in place. It was a little 'wiggly' but it kept me from damaging rims or needing to stop and fight a tube in. On 2.6 Schwalbes. 

You've run Tannus and these, would you rate these better? And I have always found the Tanks to provide meaningful support on these specific 2.6 tires. In fact, my New Years day ride I tried running lower pressures than I ever have and turns out 15F and 17R works incredibly well for traction on a slippery day. I think it might have been one of my fastest, most dialed rides ever actually and I even forgot I was testing such low pressures as it all felt so good. 

But I am very curious about a Tannus Tubeless to Vittoria direct comparison in your opinion. Assuming the tire is sized correctly for the insert.

Reply

cam@nsmb.com
0

My standard of "run flat" might be quite high. For a vehicle I believe the standard is 50 miles/80 km at 50mph/kmh. For me on a bike I consider the standard to be the ability to ride at around 80% pace with good control without major concern about rim damage. I want to be able to do drops and jumps and berms and rock faces, just not at full throttle. I don't find I can do that on Tannus tubeless, and I've tried several times.* With the right size of tire, these are miles ahead of Tannus tubeless because much of their support comes from pressure in the tire because of their large void. 

*considering you can stuff a tube in them and have it be protected, I also think there is little point in running it flat. With others that's not a great option. 

These, assuming the tire size is appropriate, and Cushcore and Octamoussue, to name three, provide support and stability that is much more independent of tire pressure. I could probably ride at 90% speed with my rear tire entirely deflated riding Airliner Protect E and an appropriately sized tire. I think my front and rear results would been quite close. 

I've often wondered about a product, like Cushcore or Protect E-bike, that contains an uninflated lightweight tube (like Tubolito) tucked into a recess of the insert and could be inflated instantly from your handlebar in the event of a flat. Obviously it wouldn't work in every situation, but I think it might function in a significant percentage of non-catastrophic race-run tire failures, salvaging valuable points.

Reply

LC
+1 BarryW

I've had the same Tannus Tubeless rear since mid 2021 and it's still OK even with some cuts.  Sticking with it because of the ability to mount a tube inside which proved its worth the one time I had to do it on a high-alpine pedal from Italian lifts - climbing singletrack with no air wasn't an option and carrying a slimy insert home doesn't appeal.

Do you think a tube will still work OK inside the new Tannus design Cam?

Reply

cam@nsmb.com
+1 Ask Petersen

Good question. The new Tannus, with the Fusion system, won't accommodate a tube without the removal of the centre portion. I think it would work fine using the pro system, without that centre portion. In most cases, you can stretch an insert around your head tube and your seatpost/seat tube to avoid wearing the bandolier of shame. Depending on your frame size, a twist might be required.

Reply

craw
+1 Kenny

Have you tried moving your Octamousse  inserts to new tires yet? Mine worked great and totally met my performance expectations until it was time to move them and they had gained about 30% in total circumference (possibly due to absorbing sealant but really who knows) and were impossible to get into a fresh set of tires. Then I switched to Cush Core Trail which are marginally heavier but work much better and ride-flat better and survived a bunch of abuse and were successfully migrated into fresh tires. 

I'm a bit of wuss when it comes to wheel weight but the extra weight of CCT was the difference between disposable and great with almost all of the benefits of CCP.

Reply

Kenny
+1 Bioradler

After time on Tannus, Nukeproof ARD, and rimpact pro, CCT is where I landed as well, and is where I plan to stay. It's the only one I've used that doesn't feel disposable.

Reply

gubbinalia
+2 Cam McRae Cr4w

Thanks for your ongoing insert-testing, Cam -- very helpful to get some insights on all the different products on the market. I was initially swayed to trying CushCore by the evangelizing of, ahem, a previous contributor on this site, along with Geoff Kabush's long-term affiliation with the brand. Now I've gotten hooked on inserts, even for gravel bikes, and hunting down the best combination for each bike is the new endeavor of bike-optimization.

I haven't been thrilled about the Air Liner "Light" for XC usage, despite some high hopes -- it just doesn't have the consistent damping and anti-squirm effect on an ~800g, 2.35/2.4 XC tire the way CushCore XC does. I found that, in terms of rim protection and run-flat (or near-flat) ability, I can run roughly the same* low pressures with the AL Light as I would with a CushCore XC, and shave some rotating weight along the way, but the ride feel really suffers. 

I can't exactly put a finger on it, but something about the AL Light inserts make the wheels feel kind of wandery, vague, or inconsistent, especially when trying to pump through or corner over the smallish roots and rocks that litter New England trails. The likely explanation in my mind is that, 1) the AL Light is designed for "up to" 2.4 tires, so it's just not enough volume; and/or 2) the AL Light has a kind of "Y" shape that doesn't make enough contact with the tire above the bead of the rim, allowing the tire to roll/deflect more. 

All of this compared to Cushcore XC, which has a more parabolic "U" shape, as the usual option for me on hardtails and 100-120mm travel XC bikes. I wish I liked the Air Liner Light and could swap the Air Liner Protects in for my Cushcore Trail inserts on the 150mm bike, which would definitely shave some weight. But based on my AL Light experience I'd probably prefer to go up to a dual-ply tire on that bike (which seems to be the trend) rather than going from CC to AL simply on the basis of grams. Heck, the dual-ply swap (say from Schwalbe Super Trail or Trail Pro, to Super Gravity / Gravity Pro) would likely save weight anyhow.

* With Cushcore XC inserts, I'm typically running 21-22psi rear, 17-18psi front for anything from damp to dusty conditions here in the Northeastern U.S., classic slow-speed rooty and jumbly XC trails, 195lb./6'3" rider.

Reply

cam@nsmb.com
+2 gubbinalia jordaño

That's a good summary of the lighter weight versions G. Thanks for that. 

I've often wondered how we have decided on how much pressure difference we should opt for front and rear, and it seems you do a little more than most with up to 4psi. I'm not even sure how we would collect data for that. Pressure sensors on each tire? Weighing the bike and rider on two scales with the rider in attack position?

The AL XC seems to be a similar design to the E-bike version, where the shape of the insert structure is predetermined and independent of the tire size or shape, so it's not surprising our results had some parallels.

The two new versions, Enduro and DH, seem to start out as a T structure and then bend into a Y determined by the width of the tire, meaning there should always be sidewall support, as long as there is air pressure to keep the tire round. I'm curious about this design when running flat. It may provide good protection but, depending on tire size, not as much sidewall support? 

Here's a link to the video depiction of what I'm talking about.

Reply

gubbinalia
+2 jordaño Cam McRae

Hmm, that's super interesting about the Enduro / DH Airliners starting to "conform" to the tire shape over time. I imagine Vittoria's design choices are in part based on the assumption that gravity riders will use stiffer, reinforced tire carcasses and thus they need inserts to "fit" the tire more than "support" the tire? The video makes me curious about how the Enduro Airliner might work when paired with a fairly light-casing (say, EXO or Super Ground) tire on a shorter-travel trail bike, even if that's not what the designers intended.

Ha, I always feel goofy listing the pressures that I run (suspension or tires) because, honestly, I could be completely off the mark about what I should be running-- let alone what a faster/more capable XC racer should be running. I'm probably an outlier given that I tend to ride off the back of the bike (long limbs exacerbate this) , gravitate toward slow and punchy tech trails, and prefer short chainstays. Most folks with a more centered riding stance, running longer chainstays, going faster on more sustained descents, would likely go for more even pressures front vs. rear.

Reply

craw
+1 gubbinalia

Don't you just use trial and error to determine the right pressure? The tubed years of terror ingrained in me (at 6'5" 225lb) to always air on the side of caution. Then came a drop in average pressure as tire casings got better and tubeless required I stick a gauge on my tires before every ride. Then came Cush Core Trail and pressures dropped again and I'm yet to find the bottom. I'm currently running 18/23 on DD tires and that's just fine though I bet I could go lower without squirming or burping.

Reply

gubbinalia
0

Definitely some trial and error involved for sure, but it's nice to know where to start, especially if doing a longer ride where elevations and temperatures may change during the day. 

Not sure if "air [err] on the side of caution" was an intentional pun but it's very fitting!

Reply

andrewbikeguide
+2 gubbinalia Andy Eunson

@gubbinalia - interesting as I don't often see a rider that is my height/ weight. 6'2"/ 190 lbs on an XL bike. I am running 21.5 psi front/ 23 psi rear on my Arrival 130 (140-150 config), which is my current 'short travel' trail bike, with Wolfpack Trail (front)/ Cross (rear) tyre set up. An amazing light tyre by the way.

I also run 21.5 psi front/ 23 psi rear on my Arrival 170, which is my 'doing dumb stuff/ burlier trails' bike, with Michelin Wild Enduro  Gum-X FRONT (front) and REAR (rear) tyres. Heavier tyres with stiffer casing including a deliberately stiffer (33 tpi) casing on the rear tyre.

Both those bikes run We Are One Convergence Triad 32 spoke wheel sets (30 mm inner).

I am one of those OCT types who does use TyreWiz 2.0 (as I am also data logging for components testing for SRAM) so I generally have an excellent idea of my tyre pressures and I also run multiple set up laps for each new bike and any new component to find the ideal set up. I might drop my psi by 1-2 in early spring and late autumn if I am riding wetter trails more slowly however I find I am pretty consistent with a working pressure for my tyres/ weight/ riding speed and skill level.

The only bike I run inserts on is my 2022 Sight VLT and mainly due to the additional weight of the bike and the fact it is my only mountain bike that doesn't run carbon rims. I also don't ride it as much as my other bikes so as a result I find that my timing can be a bit off when I ride it meaning that the wheels are more at risk of a negative terrain interaction.

It has a DT Hybrid 1700 wheelset and I have Tannus Tubeless liners (what they are now clearing as the Classic), which doesn't really provide full flat tyre support, although I have managed a decent Rupert with 6 psi in the rear tyre when I had a faulty valve day a couple of years ago. Even with the extra weight of the e-bike I am able to run 23 psi front and 25 psi rear with Michelin WILD Enduro FRONT on both wheels (better rear grip and braking on the heavier bike). I think that the liners do some sterling work on keeping the rims true on this bike.

Reply

gubbinalia
0

"Negative terrain interaction," ha! I'm going to start using that phrase...

Interesting you mention riding the Arrival as I found that bike (in size 3/XL) a little shorter than I wanted at my height. Very fun and zippy in lower-angle terrain, though, compared to other enduro-ish / all-mountain bikes. I typically had to go up in suspension and tire pressures on that bike (I was running Schwalbe Super Trail casing tires with no inserts) because the bike wanted to corner pretty assertively. Definitely a different story with the Arrival than with the type of XCish 120mm bike where I like running inserts, low pressures and fairly supple tires.

Reply

andy-eunson
0

I tried Tannus tubeless inserts a few years back. I found that I needed about the same pressures as I did without inserts to prevent tire squirm. At my weight, 145 ish I can run low psi. As low as 15 front and 17 rear depending on conditions and tire carcass construction. 17-20 ish more normal for me. As I don’t pinch flat often and the Tannus don’t support the sidewalls like Cushcore might, there was no benefit to me. 

Some other site had a pole of WC DH riders and very few used inserts. I don’t recall why that was.

Reply

kos
+1 Cam McRae

Great torture test! Do you think one or the other absorbs more or less sealant?

Reply

cam@nsmb.com
+3 bushtrucker Kos Cr4w

Cushcore is very resistant to absorption based on years of experience. 

While based on a much shorter time frame, I would say that the Airliner protects are similarly resistant to sucking up the muck.

Reply

jordaño
+1 BarryW

I'd love to see a review and comparison between Vittoria's new Enduro and DH inserts and CushCore Trail inserts; they look compelling at a lower weight.

Reply

cam@nsmb.com
+2 BarryW jordaño

Working on that! I'm interested as well.

Reply

NickM
+1 Cam McRae

I've only got an insert in the rear wheel of my hardtail (PTN) but am considering one for my full-sus that I'm building - thanks for the excellent review!

*I also hate to be that guy, but it's Aaron Gwin, not Gwinn

Reply

cam@nsmb.com
+1 jordaño

THANK YOU for being that guy. I appreciate the catch. I hate gaffes like that but I'm prone to them, even when I know how something should be spelled!

Thanks of the kind words as well.

Reply

Sethimus
+1 Timer

cam, i think you got your timeline wrong. pepi's tire noodles were a thing since 2015

Reply

cam@nsmb.com
0

Good point Sethimus. Liners were certainly around before 2017.  I'm referring to when inserts began to be considered by more serious riders, whether that should have happened earlier or not. In the era of tubes, which isn't that long ago for the kind of riding we do, I don't know of anyone who ran any sort of liner or insert.

Reply

Sethimus
+1 Cam McRae

i only have experience with their first gen inserts (air liner mtb m), i only ride them in the back (kryptotal rear enduro), front dh kryptos in super soft no insert. so far i never flattened them nor dinged a rim

Reply

sockpuppet
0

Wonder how poorly they would play with my Spank Vibrocores weird azz oobah profile?

Reply

Larrabee
0

Great review. TONNES of useful info. Thx.

If you’re amenable to spelling corrections, how about grammar?

“This is true for everyone from World Cup Downhill racers, to Tour de France competitors and to ordinary riders like you and I.”

Test the sentence by omitting the 3rd last and 2nd last words and then reading it through.

I suggest:

“…. ordinary riders like you and me.”

I’m as old as the hills and learned this trick in Mrs. Rawn’s Gr. 2* class (‘64-‘65).

*Stayner, ON.

Reply

Please log in to leave a comment.